ICAFX vs. CTCAX
ICAFX (American Funds The Investment Company of America Fund Class F2) and CTCAX (Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A) are both mutual funds - ICAFX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by American Funds, while CTCAX is a Technology Equities fund managed by Columbia. Over the past 10 years, ICAFX returned 14.49%/yr vs 24.75%/yr for CTCAX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ICAFX charges 0.37%/yr vs 1.18%/yr for CTCAX.
Performance
ICAFX vs. CTCAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ICAFX achieves a 10.98% return, which is significantly lower than CTCAX's 32.06% return. Over the past 10 years, ICAFX has underperformed CTCAX with an annualized return of 14.49%, while CTCAX has yielded a comparatively higher 24.75% annualized return.
ICAFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 10.98%
- 6M
- 10.95%
- 1Y
- 26.91%
- 3Y*
- 24.44%
- 5Y*
- 15.25%
- 10Y*
- 14.49%
CTCAX
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- 17.00%
- YTD
- 32.06%
- 6M
- 31.15%
- 1Y
- 61.81%
- 3Y*
- 36.07%
- 5Y*
- 20.96%
- 10Y*
- 24.75%
ICAFX vs. CTCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICAFX American Funds The Investment Company of America Fund Class F2 | 10.98% | 20.69% | 25.14% | 28.82% | -15.32% | 25.35% | 14.70% | 24.32% | -8.02% | 19.75% |
CTCAX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A | 32.06% | 24.78% | 31.39% | 56.46% | -34.81% | 22.73% | 49.46% | 43.91% | -1.48% | 42.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between ICAFX and CTCAX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2008 | 0.85 |
The correlation between ICAFX and CTCAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ICAFX vs. CTCAX — Risk / Return Rank
ICAFX
CTCAX
ICAFX vs. CTCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds The Investment Company of America Fund Class F2 (ICAFX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ICAFX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.23 | 3.04 | -0.81 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.06 | 3.68 | -0.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.49 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 4.43 | -1.67 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.54 | 16.56 | -4.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ICAFX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | 3.04 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 0.81 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | 1.00 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.78 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
ICAFX vs. CTCAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ICAFX drawdown since its inception was -42.84%, smaller than the maximum CTCAX drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICAFX and CTCAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ICAFX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.84% | -61.04% | +18.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.05% | -14.43% | +4.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.39% | -26.67% | +9.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.21% | -39.55% | +15.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.07% | -39.55% | +8.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.48% | -10.68% | +5.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 3.86% | -1.65% |
Volatility
ICAFX vs. CTCAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Funds The Investment Company of America Fund Class F2 (ICAFX) is 3.26%, while Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX) has a volatility of 6.37%. This indicates that ICAFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ICAFX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.26% | 6.37% | -3.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.73% | 16.72% | -6.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.46% | 21.06% | -8.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.00% | 25.98% | -9.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.59% | 24.84% | -8.25% |
ICAFX vs. CTCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ICAFX has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than CTCAX's 1.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
ICAFX vs. CTCAX - Dividend Comparison
ICAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.75%, more than CTCAX's 2.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTCAX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A | 2.49% | 3.29% | 1.08% | 2.36% | 3.53% | 4.15% | 0.91% | 2.55% | 5.82% | 3.52% | 0.36% | 1.80% |
ICAFX American Funds The Investment Company of America Fund Class F2 | 9.75% | 10.79% | 9.49% | 5.15% | 6.33% | 7.14% | 1.84% | 6.34% | 9.84% | 7.25% | 5.67% | 9.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ICAFX and CTCAX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CTCAX has higher volatility (6.37%) compared to ICAFX (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ICAFX dropped -42.84% vs CTCAX's -61.04%.
CTCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.04 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ICAFX and CTCAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer