ICAE.TO vs. PDF.TO

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

ICAE.TO (Invesco S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats ESG Index ETF) and PDF.TO (Purpose Core Dividend Fund) are both Dividend funds. ICAE.TO is passively managed, while PDF.TO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ICAE.TO returned 15.95%/yr vs 19.06%/yr for PDF.TO. Their 0.31 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ICAE.TO charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for PDF.TO.

Performance

ICAE.TO vs. PDF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats ESG Index ETF (ICAE.TO) and Purpose Core Dividend Fund (PDF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ICAE.TO achieves a 18.85% return, which is significantly lower than PDF.TO's 20.56% return.

ICAE.TO

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 2.32%
• 6M: 17.35%
• YTD: 18.85%
• 1Y: 18.52%
• 3Y*: 15.95%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.49%

PDF.TO

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 1.78%
• 6M: 16.58%
• YTD: 20.56%
• 1Y: 35.64%
• 3Y*: 19.06%
• 5Y*: 12.16%
• 10Y*: 9.70%
• ALL TIME*: 10.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ICAE.TO Invesco S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats ESG Index ETF	CA$1.16K	CA$2.33K	CA$4.66K
PDF.TO Purpose Core Dividend Fund	CA$197.79K	CA$214.85K	CA$225.89K

ICAE.TO vs. PDF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ICAE.TO Invesco S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats ESG Index ETF	18.85%	10.02%	17.62%	5.84%
PDF.TO Purpose Core Dividend Fund	20.56%	20.44%	13.61%	4.95%

Correlation

The correlation between ICAE.TO and PDF.TO is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2023	0.31

ICAE.TO vs. PDF.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ICAE.TO	PDF.TO
Financial Services	45.5%	43.2%
Energy	16.3%	12.3%
Industrials	10.3%	6.5%
Basic Materials	9.9%	3.9%
Consumer Defensive	6.4%	3.6%
Consumer Cyclical	4.5%	8.2%
Utilities	4.4%	4.7%
Communication Services	1.3%	2.9%
Technology	0.4%	7.8%
Real Estate	0.4%	-
Healthcare	-	6.9%

Return for Risk

ICAE.TO vs. PDF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ICAE.TO

ICAE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 36
ICAE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
ICAE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
ICAE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 59
ICAE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
ICAE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 26

PDF.TO

PDF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 97
PDF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
PDF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
PDF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
PDF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
PDF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ICAE.TO vs. PDF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats ESG Index ETF (ICAE.TO) and Purpose Core Dividend Fund (PDF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ICAE.TO	PDF.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.92	4.17	-3.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.19	6.01	-4.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.78	-0.49
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.11	5.54	-4.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.21	25.22	-23.01

ICAE.TO vs. PDF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ICAE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the PDF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ICAE.TO and PDF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ICAE.TO vs. PDF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ICAE.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.49%, smaller than the maximum PDF.TO drawdown of -36.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ICAE.TO and PDF.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ICAE.TO	PDF.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.49%	-36.00%	+19.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.49%	-6.35%	-10.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.49%	-9.28%	-7.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-15.81%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.02%	-0.76%	-0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.48%	-3.44%	-0.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.23%	1.39%	+6.84%

Volatility

ICAE.TO vs. PDF.TO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats ESG Index ETF (ICAE.TO) and Purpose Core Dividend Fund (PDF.TO) have volatilities of 2.78% and 2.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ICAE.TO	PDF.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.78%	2.82%	-0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.14%	6.95%	+1.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.82%	8.46%	+11.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.90%	10.35%	+5.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.90%	13.58%	+2.32%

ICAE.TO vs. PDF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ICAE.TO has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than PDF.TO's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

ICAE.TO vs. PDF.TO - Dividend Comparison

ICAE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, less than PDF.TO's 2.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ICAE.TO Invesco S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats ESG Index ETF	2.71%	3.29%	3.33%	2.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PDF.TO Purpose Core Dividend Fund	2.78%	3.49%	3.82%	4.17%	3.77%	3.19%	3.84%	3.65%	4.33%	3.50%	3.38%	3.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ICAE.TO and PDF.TO in my portfolio?

ICAE.TO and PDF.TO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ICAE.TO or PDF.TO?

On fees, ICAE.TO is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ICAE.TO or PDF.TO?

ICAE.TO is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for PDF.TO.

What is the main difference between ICAE.TO and PDF.TO?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Purpose. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for ICAE.TO and 0.66% for PDF.TO.