IBUY vs. RTH
IBUY (Amplify Online Retail ETF) and RTH (VanEck Vectors Retail ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - IBUY tracks the EQM Online Retail Index while RTH tracks the MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IBUY returned 10.38%/yr vs 13.87%/yr for RTH. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBUY charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RTH.
Performance
IBUY vs. RTH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBUY achieves a -10.92% return, which is significantly lower than RTH's 1.87% return. Over the past 10 years, IBUY has underperformed RTH with an annualized return of 10.38%, while RTH has yielded a comparatively higher 13.87% annualized return.
IBUY
- 1D
- -1.83%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- YTD
- -10.92%
- 6M
- -10.14%
- 1Y
- -2.54%
- 3Y*
- 15.79%
- 5Y*
- -11.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.38%
RTH
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -4.91%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- 7.77%
- 3Y*
- 16.09%
- 5Y*
- 9.36%
- 10Y*
- 13.87%
IBUY vs. RTH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBUY Amplify Online Retail ETF | -10.92% | 15.26% | 20.14% | 38.01% | -55.71% | -22.99% | 123.79% | 28.47% | -1.93% | 50.27% |
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 1.87% | 12.36% | 20.02% | 20.07% | -17.67% | 24.94% | 31.62% | 29.06% | 3.87% | 22.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBUY and RTH is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2016 | 0.66 |
The correlation between IBUY and RTH shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IBUY vs. RTH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IBUY
RTH
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Technology
-
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
IBUY
RTH
Communication Services
IBUY
RTH
-
Technology
IBUY
RTH
-
Industrials
IBUY
RTH
Healthcare
IBUY
RTH
Financial Services
IBUY
RTH
-
Consumer Defensive
IBUY
RTH
Real Estate
IBUY
RTH
-
Basic Materials
IBUY
-
RTH
-
Energy
IBUY
-
RTH
-
Utilities
IBUY
-
RTH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBUY vs. RTH — Risk / Return Rank
IBUY
RTH
IBUY vs. RTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Online Retail ETF (IBUY) and VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBUY | RTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | 0.65 | -0.77 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | 1.04 | -1.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.12 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 1.00 | -1.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.24 | 3.46 | -3.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBUY | RTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 | 0.65 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.36 | 0.56 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.79 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.50 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
IBUY vs. RTH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBUY drawdown since its inception was -73.00%, which is greater than RTH's maximum drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBUY and RTH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBUY | RTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.00% | -42.32% | -30.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.23% | -7.83% | -15.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.87% | -13.80% | -15.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.15% | -25.00% | -46.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.00% | -25.00% | -48.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.29% | -5.85% | -46.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.65% | -7.34% | -22.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.50% | 2.26% | +8.24% |
Volatility
IBUY vs. RTH - Volatility Comparison
Amplify Online Retail ETF (IBUY) has a higher volatility of 5.60% compared to VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) at 3.83%. This indicates that IBUY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBUY | RTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.60% | 3.83% | +1.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.70% | 9.22% | +6.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.51% | 12.07% | +9.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.07% | 16.81% | +15.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.16% | 17.54% | +11.62% |
IBUY vs. RTH - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBUY has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than RTH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBUY vs. RTH - Dividend Comparison
IBUY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than RTH's 0.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBUY Amplify Online Retail ETF | 0.12% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.54% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 0.95% | 0.97% | 0.77% | 1.07% | 1.16% | 0.78% | 0.64% | 0.91% | 1.05% | 1.56% | 1.84% | 2.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBUY and RTH have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBUY has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to RTH (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBUY dropped -73.00% vs RTH's -42.32%.
On 10-year performance, RTH leads with 13.87% vs 10.38% for IBUY. On fees, RTH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RTH has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RTH has performed better with a 13.87% return vs 10.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RTH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IBUY.
RTH has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.12% for IBUY.
IBUY tracks EQM Online Retail Index, while RTH tracks MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IBUY and 0.35% for RTH.
RTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.65 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBUY and RTH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer