IBUY vs. RTH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

IBUY (Amplify Online Retail ETF) and RTH (VanEck Vectors Retail ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - IBUY tracks the EQM Online Retail Index while RTH tracks the MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IBUY returned 11.07%/yr vs 14.17%/yr for RTH. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBUY charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RTH.

Performance

IBUY vs. RTH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Online Retail ETF (IBUY) and VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBUY achieves a -9.12% return, which is significantly lower than RTH's 2.29% return. Over the past 10 years, IBUY has underperformed RTH with an annualized return of 11.07%, while RTH has yielded a comparatively higher 14.17% annualized return.

IBUY

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 3.20%
• YTD: -9.12%
• 6M: -9.86%
• 1Y: 2.17%
• 3Y*: 15.47%
• 5Y*: -12.18%
• 10Y*: 11.07%

RTH

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: -3.21%
• YTD: 2.29%
• 6M: 1.90%
• 1Y: 9.66%
• 3Y*: 15.15%
• 5Y*: 9.06%
• 10Y*: 14.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBUY vs. RTH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IBUY Amplify Online Retail ETF	-9.12%	15.26%	20.14%	38.01%	-55.71%	-22.99%	123.79%	28.47%	-1.93%	50.27%
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF	2.29%	12.36%	20.02%	20.07%	-17.67%	24.94%	31.62%	29.06%	3.87%	22.45%

Correlation

The correlation between IBUY and RTH is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2016	0.66

The correlation between IBUY and RTH shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IBUY vs. RTH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IBUY	RTH
Consumer Cyclical	68.1%	57.2%
Communication Services	8.6%	-
Technology	6.0%	-
Financial Services	5.1%	-
Healthcare	5.0%	13.4%
Industrials	4.9%	2.6%
Consumer Defensive	1.7%	26.8%
Real Estate	0.6%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Energy	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

IBUY vs. RTH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBUY

IBUY Risk / Return Rank: 10
IBUY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
IBUY Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
IBUY Omega Ratio Rank: 10
IBUY Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
IBUY Martin Ratio Rank: 9

RTH

RTH Risk / Return Rank: 25
RTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
RTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
RTH Omega Ratio Rank: 22
RTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
RTH Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBUY vs. RTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Online Retail ETF (IBUY) and VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IBUY	RTH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.10	0.78	-0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.29	1.22	-0.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.14	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.09	1.24	-1.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.20	3.93	-3.73

IBUY vs. RTH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBUY Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the RTH Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBUY and RTH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IBUY vs. RTH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBUY drawdown since its inception was -73.00%, which is greater than RTH's maximum drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBUY and RTH.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBUY	RTH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.00%	-42.32%	-30.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.23%	-7.83%	-15.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.87%	-13.80%	-15.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-71.15%	-25.00%	-46.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-73.00%	-25.00%	-48.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-51.33%	-5.46%	-45.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.75%	-7.33%	-22.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.99%	2.46%	+8.53%

Volatility

IBUY vs. RTH - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Online Retail ETF (IBUY) has a higher volatility of 6.65% compared to VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) at 4.59%. This indicates that IBUY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IBUY	RTH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.65%	4.59%	+2.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.52%	9.71%	+6.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.87%	12.40%	+9.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.13%	16.85%	+15.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.18%	17.57%	+11.61%

IBUY vs. RTH - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBUY has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than RTH's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

IBUY vs. RTH - Dividend Comparison

IBUY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than RTH's 0.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IBUY Amplify Online Retail ETF	0.12%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.54%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF	0.95%	0.97%	0.77%	1.07%	1.16%	0.78%	0.64%	0.91%	1.05%	1.56%	1.84%	2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBUY and RTH in my portfolio?

IBUY and RTH have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IBUY or RTH?

IBUY has higher volatility (6.65%) compared to RTH (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBUY dropped -73.00% vs RTH's -42.32%.

Which ETF is better, IBUY or RTH?

On 10-year performance, RTH leads with 14.17% vs 11.07% for IBUY. On fees, RTH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RTH has been the lower-risk option at 4.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IBUY or RTH?

Over the 10-year period, RTH has performed better with a 14.17% return vs 11.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBUY or RTH?

RTH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IBUY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBUY or RTH?

RTH has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.12% for IBUY.

What is the main difference between IBUY and RTH?

IBUY tracks EQM Online Retail Index, while RTH tracks MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IBUY and 0.35% for RTH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.