IBUY vs. RSPD
IBUY (Amplify Online Retail ETF) and RSPD (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - IBUY tracks the EQM Online Retail Index while RSPD tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Discretionary -SEC. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IBUY returned 11.07%/yr vs 8.53%/yr for RSPD. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBUY charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPD.
Performance
IBUY vs. RSPD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBUY achieves a -9.12% return, which is significantly lower than RSPD's -3.06% return. Over the past 10 years, IBUY has outperformed RSPD with an annualized return of 11.07%, while RSPD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.53% annualized return.
IBUY
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- YTD
- -9.12%
- 6M
- -9.86%
- 1Y
- 2.17%
- 3Y*
- 15.47%
- 5Y*
- -12.18%
- 10Y*
- 11.07%
RSPD
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- YTD
- -3.06%
- 6M
- -4.33%
- 1Y
- 6.74%
- 3Y*
- 8.83%
- 5Y*
- 3.43%
- 10Y*
- 8.53%
IBUY vs. RSPD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBUY Amplify Online Retail ETF | -9.12% | 15.26% | 20.14% | 38.01% | -55.71% | -22.99% | 123.79% | 28.47% | -1.93% | 50.27% |
RSPD Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF | -3.06% | 7.98% | 13.37% | 22.55% | -24.03% | 28.75% | 11.43% | 25.88% | -8.79% | 15.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBUY and RSPD is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2016 | 0.72 |
The correlation between IBUY and RSPD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
IBUY vs. RSPD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IBUY
RSPD
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
IBUY
RSPD
Communication Services
IBUY
RSPD
Technology
IBUY
RSPD
Financial Services
IBUY
RSPD
Healthcare
IBUY
RSPD
-
Industrials
IBUY
RSPD
Consumer Defensive
IBUY
RSPD
-
Real Estate
IBUY
RSPD
-
Basic Materials
IBUY
-
RSPD
-
Energy
IBUY
-
RSPD
-
Utilities
IBUY
-
RSPD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBUY vs. RSPD — Risk / Return Rank
IBUY
RSPD
IBUY vs. RSPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Online Retail ETF (IBUY) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBUY | RSPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.07 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.09 | 0.49 | -0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.20 | 1.17 | -0.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBUY vs. RSPD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBUY drawdown since its inception was -73.00%, which is greater than RSPD's maximum drawdown of -68.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBUY and RSPD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBUY | RSPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.00% | -68.00% | -5.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.23% | -13.80% | -9.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.87% | -21.01% | -7.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.15% | -34.41% | -36.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.00% | -48.00% | -25.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.33% | -7.89% | -43.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.75% | -10.69% | -19.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.99% | 5.77% | +5.22% |
Volatility
IBUY vs. RSPD - Volatility Comparison
Amplify Online Retail ETF (IBUY) has a higher volatility of 6.65% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) at 5.66%. This indicates that IBUY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSPD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBUY | RSPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.65% | 5.66% | +0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.52% | 14.03% | +2.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.87% | 18.54% | +3.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.13% | 22.17% | +9.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.18% | 23.12% | +6.06% |
IBUY vs. RSPD - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBUY has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than RSPD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBUY vs. RSPD - Dividend Comparison
IBUY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than RSPD's 0.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBUY Amplify Online Retail ETF | 0.12% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.54% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSPD Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.89% | 1.08% | 0.84% | 1.09% | 0.99% | 0.53% | 0.81% | 1.59% | 1.67% | 1.45% | 1.27% | 1.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBUY and RSPD have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBUY has higher volatility (6.65%) compared to RSPD (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBUY dropped -73.00% vs RSPD's -68.00%.
On 10-year performance, IBUY leads with 11.07% vs 8.53% for RSPD. On fees, RSPD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, RSPD has been the lower-risk option at 5.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IBUY has performed better with a 11.07% return vs 8.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSPD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IBUY.
RSPD has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.12% for IBUY.
IBUY tracks EQM Online Retail Index, while RSPD tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Discretionary -SEC. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IBUY and 0.40% for RSPD.
RSPD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.37 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBUY and RSPD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer