IBUY vs. ONLN
IBUY (Amplify Online Retail ETF) and ONLN (ProShares Online Retail ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - IBUY tracks the EQM Online Retail Index while ONLN tracks the ProShares Online Retail Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IBUY returned -11.36%/yr vs -6.10%/yr for ONLN. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IBUY charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for ONLN.
Performance
IBUY vs. ONLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBUY achieves a -10.92% return, which is significantly lower than ONLN's -6.45% return.
IBUY
- 1D
- -1.83%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- YTD
- -10.92%
- 6M
- -10.14%
- 1Y
- -2.54%
- 3Y*
- 15.79%
- 5Y*
- -11.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.38%
ONLN
- 1D
- -2.12%
- 1M
- -7.61%
- YTD
- -6.45%
- 6M
- -7.82%
- 1Y
- 12.40%
- 3Y*
- 21.88%
- 5Y*
- -6.10%
- 10Y*
- —
IBUY vs. ONLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBUY Amplify Online Retail ETF | -10.92% | 15.26% | 20.14% | 38.01% | -55.71% | -22.99% | 123.79% | 28.47% | -24.12% |
ONLN ProShares Online Retail ETF | -6.45% | 33.03% | 24.85% | 27.37% | -50.07% | -25.22% | 111.82% | 19.93% | -24.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBUY and ONLN is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2018 | 0.91 |
The correlation between IBUY and ONLN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
IBUY vs. ONLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IBUY
ONLN
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Technology
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
IBUY
ONLN
Communication Services
IBUY
ONLN
-
Technology
IBUY
ONLN
Industrials
IBUY
ONLN
-
Healthcare
IBUY
ONLN
-
Financial Services
IBUY
ONLN
-
Consumer Defensive
IBUY
ONLN
Real Estate
IBUY
ONLN
-
Basic Materials
IBUY
-
ONLN
-
Energy
IBUY
-
ONLN
-
Utilities
IBUY
-
ONLN
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBUY vs. ONLN — Risk / Return Rank
IBUY
ONLN
IBUY vs. ONLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Online Retail ETF (IBUY) and ProShares Online Retail ETF (ONLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBUY | ONLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.10 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 0.63 | -0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.24 | 1.61 | -1.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBUY | ONLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 | 0.53 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.36 | -0.19 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.14 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
IBUY vs. ONLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBUY drawdown since its inception was -73.00%, roughly equal to the maximum ONLN drawdown of -71.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBUY and ONLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBUY | ONLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.00% | -71.77% | -1.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.23% | -19.75% | -3.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.87% | -27.97% | -0.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.15% | -69.19% | -1.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.29% | -39.42% | -12.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.65% | -35.43% | +5.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.50% | 7.73% | +2.77% |
Volatility
IBUY vs. ONLN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amplify Online Retail ETF (IBUY) is 5.60%, while ProShares Online Retail ETF (ONLN) has a volatility of 6.23%. This indicates that IBUY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ONLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBUY | ONLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.60% | 6.23% | -0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.70% | 17.29% | -1.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.51% | 23.75% | -2.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.07% | 33.04% | -0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.16% | 32.10% | -2.94% |
IBUY vs. ONLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBUY has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ONLN's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBUY vs. ONLN - Dividend Comparison
IBUY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than ONLN's 0.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBUY Amplify Online Retail ETF | 0.12% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.54% | 0.29% |
ONLN ProShares Online Retail ETF | 0.35% | 0.30% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.24% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBUY and ONLN have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ONLN has higher volatility (6.23%) compared to IBUY (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBUY dropped -73.00% vs ONLN's -71.77%.
On 5-year performance, ONLN leads with -6.10% vs -11.36% for IBUY. On fees, ONLN is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, IBUY has been the lower-risk option at 5.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ONLN has performed better with a -6.10% return vs -11.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ONLN is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IBUY.
ONLN has the higher dividend yield at 0.35%, compared with 0.12% for IBUY.
IBUY tracks EQM Online Retail Index, while ONLN tracks ProShares Online Retail Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IBUY and 0.58% for ONLN.
ONLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBUY and ONLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer