PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBTS.L vs. BBM3.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBTS.L vs. BBM3.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (IBTS.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBM3.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBTS.L achieves a 0.51% return, which is significantly lower than BBM3.L's 1.54% return.


IBTS.L

1D
0.19%
1M
1.36%
YTD
0.51%
6M
0.07%
1Y
4.08%
3Y*
1.62%
5Y*
2.92%
10Y*
2.54%

BBM3.L

1D
0.26%
1M
1.67%
YTD
1.54%
6M
1.04%
1Y
4.51%
3Y*
2.09%
5Y*
4.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBTS.L vs. BBM3.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IBTS.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF
0.51%-1.91%5.79%-1.41%7.61%3.84%
BBM3.L
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
1.54%-2.96%7.04%-0.79%13.68%4.38%

Correlation

The correlation between IBTS.L and BBM3.L is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2021

0.96

The correlation between IBTS.L and BBM3.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBTS.L vs. BBM3.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBTS.L
IBTS.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
IBTS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

BBM3.L
BBM3.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
BBM3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBM3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBM3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
BBM3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBM3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBTS.L vs. BBM3.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (IBTS.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBM3.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBTS.LBBM3.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.12

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

0.99

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.29

2.48

-0.19

IBTS.L vs. BBM3.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBTS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is comparable to the BBM3.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBTS.L and BBM3.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBTS.LBBM3.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

0.69

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.54

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.50

-0.15

Drawdowns

IBTS.L vs. BBM3.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBTS.L drawdown since its inception was -19.02%, which is greater than BBM3.L's maximum drawdown of -15.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTS.L and BBM3.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBTS.LBBM3.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.02%

-15.27%

-3.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.51%

-4.52%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.89%

-9.77%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.28%

-15.27%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.64%

-5.73%

-1.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.93%

-6.31%

-1.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.77%

1.81%

-0.04%

Volatility

IBTS.L vs. BBM3.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (IBTS.L) is 1.69%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBM3.L) has a volatility of 1.93%. This indicates that IBTS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBM3.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBTS.LBBM3.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.69%

1.93%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.49%

4.68%

-0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.10%

6.47%

-0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.09%

8.43%

-0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.24%

8.38%

+0.86%

IBTS.L vs. BBM3.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IBTS.L and BBM3.L have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBTS.L vs. BBM3.L - Dividend Comparison

IBTS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, while BBM3.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBM3.L
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-3 Months UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IBTS.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF
4.00%4.22%4.12%3.08%0.75%0.61%1.84%2.39%1.49%1.01%0.67%0.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, IBTS.L and BBM3.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.07% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBTS.L and BBM3.L have the same expense ratio: 0.07% per year.

IBTS.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index, while BBM3.L tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Notes & Bills Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBTS.L and BBM3.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer