PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBTO vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBTO vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF (IBTO) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBTO achieves a -0.58% return, which is significantly lower than SLV's 2.78% return.


IBTO

1D
-0.21%
1M
-0.17%
YTD
-0.58%
6M
-1.02%
1Y
4.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SLV

1D
-2.62%
1M
0.41%
YTD
2.78%
6M
24.76%
1Y
110.59%
3Y*
45.06%
5Y*
20.76%
10Y*
15.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBTO vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IBTO
iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF
-0.58%8.23%-0.87%1.71%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
2.78%144.66%20.89%5.12%

Correlation

The correlation between IBTO and SLV is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBTO vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBTO
IBTO Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
IBTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTO Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTO Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBTO vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF (IBTO) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBTOSLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.35

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

2.62

-1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.21

5.64

-2.43

IBTO vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBTO Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBTO and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBTOSLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

1.89

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.25

+0.18

Drawdowns

IBTO vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBTO drawdown since its inception was -8.36%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTO and SLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBTOSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.36%

-76.28%

+67.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.66%

-42.45%

+38.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.63%

-37.30%

+34.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.37%

-44.67%

+42.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.26%

19.67%

-18.41%

Volatility

IBTO vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF (IBTO) is 1.32%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.30%. This indicates that IBTO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBTOSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.32%

16.30%

-14.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.02%

58.31%

-55.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.46%

58.90%

-54.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.61%

36.15%

-29.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.61%

31.84%

-25.23%

IBTO vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBTO has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBTO vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

IBTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBTO
iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF
4.15%4.05%4.23%1.66%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBTO and SLV have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to IBTO (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBTO dropped -8.36% vs SLV's -76.28%.

On 1-year performance, SLV leads with 110.59% vs 4.04% for IBTO. On fees, IBTO is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IBTO has been the lower-risk option at 1.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SLV has performed better with a 110.59% return vs 4.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBTO is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.

IBTO has the higher dividend yield at 4.15%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

IBTO is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while SLV is Silver. IBTO tracks ICE 2033 Maturity US Treasury Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTO and 0.50% for SLV.

SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBTO and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer