IBTO vs. HTAB
IBTO (iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF) and HTAB (Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. IBTO is passively managed, while HTAB is actively managed. Over the past year, IBTO returned 4.04% vs 6.89% for HTAB. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBTO charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for HTAB.
Performance
IBTO vs. HTAB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBTO achieves a -0.58% return, which is significantly lower than HTAB's 1.48% return.
IBTO
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- YTD
- -0.58%
- 6M
- -1.02%
- 1Y
- 4.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HTAB
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 1.64%
- 1Y
- 6.89%
- 3Y*
- 3.43%
- 5Y*
- 0.69%
- 10Y*
- —
IBTO vs. HTAB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTO iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF | -0.58% | 8.23% | -0.87% | 1.71% |
HTAB Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF | 1.48% | 2.86% | 1.52% | 3.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBTO and HTAB is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023 | 0.74 |
The correlation between IBTO and HTAB shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBTO vs. HTAB — Risk / Return Rank
IBTO
HTAB
IBTO vs. HTAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF (IBTO) and Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBTO | HTAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.33 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 2.43 | -1.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.21 | 7.68 | -4.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBTO | HTAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 1.72 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.44 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
IBTO vs. HTAB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBTO drawdown since its inception was -8.36%, smaller than the maximum HTAB drawdown of -14.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTO and HTAB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBTO | HTAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.36% | -14.76% | +6.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.66% | -2.85% | -0.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -8.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.63% | -0.86% | -1.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.37% | -2.89% | +0.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.26% | 0.90% | +0.36% |
Volatility
IBTO vs. HTAB - Volatility Comparison
iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF (IBTO) has a higher volatility of 1.32% compared to Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF (HTAB) at 1.25%. This indicates that IBTO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBTO | HTAB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.32% | 1.25% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.02% | 2.80% | +0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.46% | 4.02% | +0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.61% | 5.74% | +0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.61% | 5.17% | +1.44% |
IBTO vs. HTAB - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBTO has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than HTAB's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBTO vs. HTAB - Dividend Comparison
IBTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, more than HTAB's 3.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTAB Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF | 3.83% | 3.88% | 3.57% | 3.21% | 2.26% | 2.18% | 1.64% | 2.77% | 1.61% |
IBTO iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF | 4.15% | 4.05% | 4.23% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBTO and HTAB have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBTO has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to HTAB (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBTO dropped -8.36% vs HTAB's -14.76%.
On 1-year performance, HTAB leads with 6.89% vs 4.04% for IBTO. On fees, IBTO is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HTAB has performed better with a 6.89% return vs 4.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBTO is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for HTAB.
IBTO has the higher dividend yield at 4.15%, compared with 3.83% for HTAB.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTO and 0.39% for HTAB.
HTAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBTO and HTAB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer