IBTL vs. GGOV
IBTL (iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF) and GGOV (iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBTL is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2031 Maturity US Treasury Index, while GGOV is a Global Bonds fund managed by iShares. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBTL charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for GGOV.
Performance
IBTL vs. GGOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBTL achieves a -0.47% return, which is significantly lower than GGOV's 2.30% return.
IBTL
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- -0.47%
- 6M
- -0.69%
- 1Y
- 3.77%
- 3Y*
- 2.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GGOV
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 2.30%
- 6M
- -1.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBTL vs. GGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBTL iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF | -0.47% | 2.60% |
GGOV iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF | 2.30% | -2.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBTL and GGOV is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBTL vs. GGOV — Risk / Return Rank
IBTL
GGOV
IBTL vs. GGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF (IBTL) and iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF (GGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBTL | GGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.05 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.60 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.90 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBTL | GGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.21 | -0.11 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
IBTL vs. GGOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBTL drawdown since its inception was -20.93%, which is greater than GGOV's maximum drawdown of -4.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTL and GGOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBTL | GGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.93% | -4.69% | -16.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.25% | -1.50% | -5.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.47% | -1.59% | -9.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | — | — |
Volatility
IBTL vs. GGOV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBTL | GGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.08% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.39% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.62% | 5.38% | -1.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.46% | 5.38% | +2.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.46% | 5.38% | +2.08% |
IBTL vs. GGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBTL has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than GGOV's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBTL vs. GGOV - Dividend Comparison
IBTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, while GGOV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGOV iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBTL iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Treasury ETF | 3.97% | 3.93% | 4.07% | 3.04% | 2.36% | 0.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBTL and GGOV have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBTL is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBTL is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for GGOV.
IBTL has the higher dividend yield at 3.97%, compared with 0.00% for GGOV.
IBTL is categorized as Government Bonds, while GGOV is Global Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTL and 0.39% for GGOV.
Find the right allocation for IBTL and GGOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer