PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBTL.L vs. TREI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBTL.L vs. TREI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTL.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TREI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IBTL.L is traded in GBp, while TREI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TREI.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBTL.L achieves a -1.44% return, which is significantly lower than TREI.L's 1.99% return.


IBTL.L

1D
0.89%
1M
-2.15%
6M
-2.03%
YTD
-1.44%
1Y
3.65%
3Y*
-2.76%
5Y*
-6.87%
10Y*
-2.29%

TREI.L

1D
0.17%
1M
-0.96%
6M
1.11%
YTD
1.99%
1Y
3.62%
3Y*
3.55%
5Y*
3.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBTL.L vs. TREI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IBTL.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist)
-1.44%-2.80%-5.51%-3.61%-22.17%-3.32%10.30%
TREI.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.99%-3.12%7.01%-0.27%12.48%0.92%-3.42%

Correlation

The correlation between IBTL.L and TREI.L is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2020

0.32

The correlation between IBTL.L and TREI.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (3 years) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBTL.L vs. TREI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBTL.L
IBTL.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
IBTL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

TREI.L
TREI.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
TREI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TREI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
TREI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
TREI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
TREI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBTL.L vs. TREI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTL.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TREI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBTL.LTREI.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.10

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.44

0.71

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.88

1.92

-1.04

IBTL.L vs. TREI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBTL.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the TREI.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBTL.L and TREI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBTL.L vs. TREI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBTL.L drawdown since its inception was -48.85%, which is greater than TREI.L's maximum drawdown of -19.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTL.L and TREI.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBTL.LTREI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.85%

-19.00%

-29.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.26%

-5.11%

-3.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.88%

-9.81%

-7.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.34%

-15.98%

-23.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.69%

-6.04%

-39.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.88%

-10.05%

-12.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.14%

1.88%

+2.26%

Volatility

IBTL.L vs. TREI.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTL.L) has a higher volatility of 2.78% compared to Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TREI.L) at 1.65%. This indicates that IBTL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TREI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBTL.LTREI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

1.65%

+1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.74%

5.14%

+1.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.71%

6.66%

+3.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.36%

8.42%

+6.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.65%

8.78%

+6.87%

IBTL.L vs. TREI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBTL.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than TREI.L's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBTL.L vs. TREI.L - Dividend Comparison

IBTL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than TREI.L's 3.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBTL.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist)
4.79%4.31%4.58%3.79%2.96%1.72%1.86%2.54%2.75%2.68%2.45%2.09%
TREI.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
3.92%4.23%4.98%4.59%1.51%0.10%0.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBTL.L and TREI.L have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TREI.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TREI.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IBTL.L.

IBTL.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index, while TREI.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Coupons Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTL.L and 0.06% for TREI.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBTL.L and TREI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer