PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TREI.L vs. IBTG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TREI.L vs. IBTG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF (TREI.L) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IBTG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TREI.L is traded in USD, while IBTG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IBTG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TREI.L achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly higher than IBTG.L's 1.19% return.


TREI.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.22%
6M
1.65%
YTD
1.77%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
4.63%
5Y*
3.32%
10Y*

IBTG.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.90%
6M
1.32%
YTD
1.19%
1Y
4.22%
3Y*
5.24%
5Y*
1.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TREI.L vs. IBTG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TREI.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF
1.77%4.31%5.17%4.98%0.53%-0.02%1.12%
IBTG.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
1.19%13.01%2.02%9.12%-14.76%-1.72%7.80%

Correlation

The correlation between TREI.L and IBTG.L is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2020

0.19

The correlation between TREI.L and IBTG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TREI.L vs. IBTG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TREI.L
TREI.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
TREI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TREI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
TREI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
TREI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
TREI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

IBTG.L
IBTG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
IBTG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TREI.L vs. IBTG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF (TREI.L) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IBTG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TREI.LIBTG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+6.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+10.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

4.71

1.10

+3.62

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

13.21

0.85

+12.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

159.95

1.70

+158.25

TREI.L vs. IBTG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TREI.L Sharpe Ratio is 6.57, which is higher than the IBTG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TREI.L and IBTG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TREI.L vs. IBTG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TREI.L drawdown since its inception was -0.68%, smaller than the maximum IBTG.L drawdown of -28.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TREI.L and IBTG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TREI.LIBTG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.68%

-28.91%

+28.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.29%

-4.57%

+4.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.29%

-9.34%

+9.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.67%

-27.65%

+26.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.63%

+1.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.06%

-8.67%

+8.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.02%

2.30%

-2.28%

Volatility

TREI.L vs. IBTG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF (TREI.L) is 0.10%, while iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IBTG.L) has a volatility of 1.95%. This indicates that TREI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBTG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TREI.LIBTG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.10%

1.95%

-1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.50%

5.12%

-4.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59%

6.96%

-6.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.55%

9.34%

-8.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.56%

9.23%

-8.67%

TREI.L vs. IBTG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TREI.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than IBTG.L's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TREI.L vs. IBTG.L - Dividend Comparison

TREI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, more than IBTG.L's 3.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IBTG.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
3.87%4.08%4.12%2.92%0.76%0.59%1.66%2.35%0.78%
TREI.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF
3.92%4.23%4.98%4.59%1.51%0.10%0.69%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TREI.L and IBTG.L have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TREI.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TREI.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBTG.L.

TREI.L tracks Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF, while IBTG.L tracks iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for TREI.L and 0.10% for IBTG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TREI.L and IBTG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer