IBTK vs. SCHQ
IBTK (iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Treasury ETF) and SCHQ (Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - IBTK tracks the ICE 2030 Maturity US Treasury Index while SCHQ tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IBTK returned -0.54%/yr vs -5.29%/yr for SCHQ. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBTK charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHQ.
Performance
IBTK vs. SCHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBTK achieves a -0.34% return, which is significantly higher than SCHQ's -0.43% return.
IBTK
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- -0.34%
- 6M
- -0.40%
- 1Y
- 3.46%
- 3Y*
- 3.17%
- 5Y*
- -0.54%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHQ
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- YTD
- -0.43%
- 6M
- -1.74%
- 1Y
- 5.22%
- 3Y*
- -0.72%
- 5Y*
- -5.29%
- 10Y*
- —
IBTK vs. SCHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTK iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Treasury ETF | -0.34% | 7.41% | 1.18% | 4.05% | -14.71% | -3.76% | -1.90% |
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | -0.43% | 5.50% | -6.44% | 3.43% | -29.44% | -4.86% | -4.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBTK and SCHQ is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2020 | 0.78 |
The correlation between IBTK and SCHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBTK vs. SCHQ — Risk / Return Rank
IBTK
SCHQ
IBTK vs. SCHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Treasury ETF (IBTK) and Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBTK | SCHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.10 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 0.75 | +0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.39 | 1.94 | +2.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBTK | SCHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 0.59 | +0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | -0.37 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.25 | -0.25 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
IBTK vs. SCHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBTK drawdown since its inception was -22.84%, smaller than the maximum SCHQ drawdown of -46.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTK and SCHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBTK | SCHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.84% | -46.13% | +23.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.31% | -7.01% | +4.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.05% | -17.65% | +11.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.22% | -40.93% | +21.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.87% | -36.82% | +26.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.57% | -26.36% | +13.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | 2.70% | -1.91% |
Volatility
IBTK vs. SCHQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Treasury ETF (IBTK) is 0.87%, while Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) has a volatility of 2.57%. This indicates that IBTK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBTK | SCHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.87% | 2.57% | -1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.03% | 5.94% | -3.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.07% | 8.93% | -5.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.78% | 14.54% | -7.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.57% | 15.33% | -8.76% |
IBTK vs. SCHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBTK has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHQ's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBTK vs. SCHQ - Dividend Comparison
IBTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, less than SCHQ's 4.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTK iShares iBonds Dec 2030 Term Treasury ETF | 3.80% | 3.79% | 3.93% | 3.05% | 2.27% | 0.84% | 0.26% | 0.00% |
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF | 4.79% | 4.54% | 4.58% | 3.79% | 2.88% | 1.69% | 1.51% | 0.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBTK and SCHQ have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHQ has higher volatility (2.57%) compared to IBTK (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBTK dropped -22.84% vs SCHQ's -46.13%.
On 5-year performance, IBTK leads with -0.54% vs -5.29% for SCHQ. On fees, SCHQ is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IBTK has been the lower-risk option at 0.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IBTK has performed better with a -0.54% return vs -5.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHQ is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IBTK.
SCHQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 3.80% for IBTK.
IBTK tracks ICE 2030 Maturity US Treasury Index, while SCHQ tracks Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTK and 0.03% for SCHQ.
IBTK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBTK and SCHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer