PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBTJ vs. WMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBTJ vs. WMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF (IBTJ) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBTJ achieves a 0.04% return, which is significantly lower than WMT's 9.07% return.


IBTJ

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.36%
YTD
0.04%
6M
0.37%
1Y
3.40%
3Y*
3.81%
5Y*
-0.15%
10Y*

WMT

1D
0.45%
1M
-7.92%
YTD
9.07%
6M
4.13%
1Y
29.24%
3Y*
34.18%
5Y*
22.42%
10Y*
19.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBTJ vs. WMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IBTJ
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF
0.04%6.89%1.82%4.49%-12.45%-3.57%4.03%
WMT
Walmart Inc.
9.07%24.49%73.99%12.88%-0.46%1.97%32.75%

Correlation

The correlation between IBTJ and WMT is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2020

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBTJ vs. WMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBTJ
IBTJ Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
IBTJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTJ Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

WMT
WMT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
WMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMT Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
WMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMT Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBTJ vs. WMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF (IBTJ) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBTJWMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.23

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

1.83

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.49

5.82

-0.33

IBTJ vs. WMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBTJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the WMT Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBTJ and WMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBTJ vs. WMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBTJ drawdown since its inception was -20.19%, smaller than the maximum WMT drawdown of -77.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTJ and WMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBTJWMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.19%

-77.14%

+56.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.62%

-15.75%

+14.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.43%

-21.93%

+17.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.21%

-25.74%

+8.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.17%

-9.81%

+3.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.71%

-14.63%

+4.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.59%

4.94%

-4.35%

Volatility

IBTJ vs. WMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF (IBTJ) is 0.69%, while Walmart Inc. (WMT) has a volatility of 9.86%. This indicates that IBTJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBTJWMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.69%

9.86%

-9.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.58%

18.49%

-16.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36%

23.67%

-21.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.73%

21.68%

-15.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.98%

21.73%

-15.75%

Dividends

IBTJ vs. WMT - Dividend Comparison

IBTJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, more than WMT's 0.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBTJ
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF
3.80%3.78%3.95%3.48%1.86%0.74%0.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WMT
Walmart Inc.
0.80%0.84%0.92%1.45%1.58%1.52%1.50%1.78%2.23%2.07%2.89%3.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBTJ and WMT have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WMT has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to IBTJ (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBTJ dropped -20.19% vs WMT's -77.14%.

IBTJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBTJ and WMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer