PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBTJ vs. VTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBTJ vs. VTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF (IBTJ) and Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBTJ achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly higher than VTG's -0.43% return.


IBTJ

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.08%
6M
-0.00%
YTD
-0.05%
1Y
2.86%
3Y*
3.68%
5Y*
-0.30%
10Y*

VTG

1D
-0.28%
1M
-0.53%
6M
-0.49%
YTD
-0.43%
1Y
2.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBTJ vs. VTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IBTJ and VTG is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025

0.90

The correlation between IBTJ and VTG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBTJ vs. VTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBTJ
IBTJ Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
IBTJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTJ Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

VTG
VTG Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
VTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTG Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
VTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTG Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBTJ vs. VTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF (IBTJ) and Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBTJVTGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.14

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

0.98

+0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.42

2.56

+1.86

IBTJ vs. VTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBTJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is higher than the VTG Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBTJ and VTG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBTJ vs. VTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBTJ drawdown since its inception was -20.19%, which is greater than VTG's maximum drawdown of -2.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTJ and VTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBTJVTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.19%

-2.89%

-17.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.62%

-2.89%

+1.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.25%

-2.21%

-4.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.67%

-0.83%

-8.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.65%

1.10%

-0.45%

Volatility

IBTJ vs. VTG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF (IBTJ) is 0.73%, while Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG) has a volatility of 1.13%. This indicates that IBTJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBTJVTGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.73%

1.13%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.67%

2.64%

-0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35%

3.53%

-1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.70%

3.53%

+2.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.95%

3.53%

+2.42%

IBTJ vs. VTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBTJ has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VTG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBTJ vs. VTG - Dividend Comparison

IBTJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, more than VTG's 3.55% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
IBTJ
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF
3.80%3.78%3.95%3.48%1.86%0.74%0.61%
VTG
Vanguard Total Treasury ETF
3.55%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBTJ and VTG have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTG has higher volatility (1.13%) compared to IBTJ (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBTJ dropped -20.19% vs VTG's -2.89%.

On 1-year performance, IBTJ leads with 2.86% vs 2.81% for VTG. On fees, VTG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IBTJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBTJ has performed better with a 2.86% return vs 2.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IBTJ.

IBTJ has the higher dividend yield at 3.80%, compared with 3.55% for VTG.

IBTJ tracks ICE 2029 Maturity US Treasury Index, while VTG tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Total Return Unhedged USD Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTJ and 0.03% for VTG.

IBTJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBTJ and VTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer