PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBTJ vs. SMBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IBTJ vs. SMBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF (IBTJ) and Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (SMBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IBTJ vs. SMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IBTJ
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF
0.07%6.89%0.09%
SMBS
Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
0.47%8.15%-0.07%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBTJ achieves a 0.07% return, which is significantly lower than SMBS's 0.47% return.


IBTJ

1D
-0.07%
1M
-0.71%
YTD
0.07%
6M
1.03%
1Y
3.99%
3Y*
3.31%
5Y*
0.24%
10Y*

SMBS

1D
0.11%
1M
-1.15%
YTD
0.47%
6M
1.88%
1Y
5.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IBTJ vs. SMBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBTJ has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SMBS's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

IBTJ vs. SMBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBTJ
IBTJ Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
IBTJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTJ Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTJ Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

SMBS
SMBS Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBTJ vs. SMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF (IBTJ) and Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (SMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBTJSMBSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.38

1.07

+0.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.13

1.54

+0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.19

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

1.93

+0.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.74

5.53

+2.21

IBTJ vs. SMBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBTJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the SMBS Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBTJ and SMBS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBTJSMBSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

1.07

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

1.28

-1.30

Correlation

The correlation between IBTJ and SMBS is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

IBTJ vs. SMBS - Dividend Comparison

IBTJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, less than SMBS's 4.82% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
IBTJ
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF
3.81%3.78%3.95%3.48%1.86%0.74%0.61%
SMBS
Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
4.82%4.83%0.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IBTJ vs. SMBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBTJ drawdown since its inception was -20.19%, which is greater than SMBS's maximum drawdown of -3.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTJ and SMBS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IBTJSMBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.19%

-3.20%

-16.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.62%

-2.83%

+1.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.14%

-1.56%

-4.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.83%

-0.77%

-9.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.54%

0.99%

-0.45%

Volatility

IBTJ vs. SMBS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF (IBTJ) is 0.90%, while Schwab Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (SMBS) has a volatility of 1.83%. This indicates that IBTJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IBTJSMBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.90%

1.83%

-0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.58%

2.75%

-1.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91%

4.77%

-1.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.77%

4.91%

+0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.07%

4.91%

+1.16%