IBTJ vs. IWM
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF (IBTJ) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM).
IBTJ and IWM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IBTJ is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE 2029 Maturity US Treasury Index. It was launched on Feb 25, 2020. IWM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. Both IBTJ and IWM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IBTJ vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IBTJ vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTJ iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF | 0.14% | 6.89% | 1.82% | 4.49% | -12.45% | -3.57% | 3.50% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 0.93% | 12.66% | 11.38% | 16.83% | -20.48% | 14.54% | 35.90% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBTJ achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 0.93% return.
IBTJ
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -0.99%
- YTD
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 1.32%
- 1Y
- 4.22%
- 3Y*
- 3.33%
- 5Y*
- 0.25%
- 10Y*
- —
IWM
- 1D
- 3.50%
- 1M
- -4.96%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 3.02%
- 1Y
- 25.66%
- 3Y*
- 12.94%
- 5Y*
- 3.34%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IBTJ vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBTJ has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
IBTJ vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank
IBTJ
IWM
IBTJ vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF (IBTJ) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBTJ | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.46 | 1.11 | +0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.25 | 1.66 | +0.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.21 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | 1.82 | +0.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.11 | 6.76 | +1.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBTJ | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 1.11 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.15 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.34 | -0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between IBTJ and IWM is -0.03. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
IBTJ vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
IBTJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than IWM's 1.02% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTJ iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF | 3.81% | 3.78% | 3.95% | 3.48% | 1.86% | 0.74% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 1.02% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% |
Drawdowns
IBTJ vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBTJ drawdown since its inception was -20.19%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTJ and IWM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBTJ | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.19% | -59.05% | +38.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.62% | -13.74% | +12.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.21% | -31.91% | +14.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.08% | -7.91% | +1.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.84% | -10.83% | +0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.53% | 3.70% | -3.17% |
Volatility
IBTJ vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Treasury ETF (IBTJ) is 0.90%, while iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has a volatility of 7.47%. This indicates that IBTJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IBTJ | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.90% | 7.47% | -6.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.57% | 14.47% | -12.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.91% | 23.18% | -20.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.77% | 22.55% | -16.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.07% | 22.99% | -16.92% |