IBTH vs. RDYY
IBTH (iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF) and RDYY (YieldMax RDDT Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBTH is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2027 Maturity US Treasury Index, while RDYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. IBTH is passively managed, while RDYY is actively managed. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBTH charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for RDYY.
Performance
IBTH vs. RDYY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBTH achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly higher than RDYY's -22.78% return.
IBTH
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 0.92%
- 6M
- 1.26%
- 1Y
- 3.93%
- 3Y*
- 3.92%
- 5Y*
- 0.47%
- 10Y*
- —
RDYY
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 2.65%
- YTD
- -22.78%
- 6M
- -20.14%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBTH vs. RDYY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBTH iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF | 0.92% | 1.22% |
RDYY YieldMax RDDT Option Income Strategy ETF | -22.78% | -6.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBTH and RDYY is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBTH vs. RDYY — Risk / Return Rank
IBTH
RDYY
IBTH vs. RDYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF (IBTH) and YieldMax RDDT Option Income Strategy ETF (RDYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBTH | RDYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.93 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.34 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 40.10 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBTH | RDYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | -0.67 | +0.82 |
Drawdowns
IBTH vs. RDYY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBTH drawdown since its inception was -16.16%, smaller than the maximum RDYY drawdown of -51.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTH and RDYY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBTH | RDYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.16% | -51.16% | +35.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -34.14% | +32.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.72% | -28.62% | +21.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.10% | — | — |
Volatility
IBTH vs. RDYY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBTH | RDYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.18% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.54% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11% | 54.12% | -53.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.20% | 54.12% | -49.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.21% | 54.12% | -49.91% |
IBTH vs. RDYY - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBTH has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than RDYY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBTH vs. RDYY - Dividend Comparison
IBTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, less than RDYY's 83.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTH iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF | 3.83% | 3.92% | 4.04% | 3.61% | 2.00% | 0.77% | 0.50% |
RDYY YieldMax RDDT Option Income Strategy ETF | 83.18% | 25.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBTH and RDYY have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBTH is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBTH is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for RDYY.
RDYY has the higher dividend yield at 83.18%, compared with 3.83% for IBTH.
IBTH is categorized as Government Bonds, while RDYY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: iShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTH and 0.99% for RDYY.
Find the right allocation for IBTH and RDYY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer