IBRN vs. PBPH
IBRN (iShares Neuroscience and Healthcare ETF) and PBPH (Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - IBRN tracks the NYSE FactSet Global Neuro Biopharma and MedTech Index while PBPH tracks the BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBRN charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBPH.
Performance
IBRN vs. PBPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBRN achieves a 14.14% return, which is significantly higher than PBPH's 1.21% return.
IBRN
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 6.49%
- YTD
- 14.14%
- 6M
- 14.25%
- 1Y
- 71.08%
- 3Y*
- 14.72%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBPH
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- -0.54%
- YTD
- 1.21%
- 6M
- 1.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBRN vs. PBPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBRN iShares Neuroscience and Healthcare ETF | 14.14% | 6.61% |
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 1.21% | 0.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBRN and PBPH is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2025 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBRN vs. PBPH — Risk / Return Rank
IBRN
PBPH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IBRN vs. PBPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Neuroscience and Healthcare ETF (IBRN) and Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF (PBPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBRN | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.12 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.92 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBRN vs. PBPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBRN drawdown since its inception was -35.38%, which is greater than PBPH's maximum drawdown of -11.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBRN and PBPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBRN | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.38% | -11.10% | -24.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.53% | +6.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.75% | -4.36% | -5.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | — | — |
Volatility
IBRN vs. PBPH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBRN | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.17% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.20% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.50% | 17.03% | +8.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.36% | 17.03% | +8.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.36% | 17.03% | +8.33% |
IBRN vs. PBPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBRN has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than PBPH's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBRN vs. PBPH - Dividend Comparison
IBRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, more than PBPH's 0.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBRN iShares Neuroscience and Healthcare ETF | 0.87% | 0.99% | 0.40% | 0.06% |
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBRN and PBPH have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBPH is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBPH is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IBRN.
IBRN has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.09% for PBPH.
IBRN tracks NYSE FactSet Global Neuro Biopharma and MedTech Index, while PBPH tracks BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Portfolio Building Block. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IBRN and 0.13% for PBPH.
Find the right allocation for IBRN and PBPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer