IBRN vs. PBPH
IBRN (iShares Neuroscience and Healthcare ETF) and PBPH (Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - IBRN tracks the NYSE FactSet Global Neuro Biopharma and MedTech Index while PBPH tracks the BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBRN charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for PBPH.
Performance
IBRN vs. PBPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBRN achieves a 4.62% return, which is significantly higher than PBPH's -1.70% return.
IBRN
- 1D
- -4.52%
- 1M
- -1.90%
- YTD
- 4.62%
- 6M
- 12.73%
- 1Y
- 52.57%
- 3Y*
- 11.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBPH
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- YTD
- -1.70%
- 6M
- 0.14%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBRN vs. PBPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBRN iShares Neuroscience and Healthcare ETF | 4.62% | 5.89% |
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | -1.70% | 0.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBRN and PBPH is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBRN vs. PBPH — Risk / Return Rank
IBRN
PBPH
IBRN vs. PBPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Neuroscience and Healthcare ETF (IBRN) and Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF (PBPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBRN | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.09 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.94 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.30 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.59 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBRN | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | -0.11 | +0.48 |
Drawdowns
IBRN vs. PBPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBRN drawdown since its inception was -35.38%, which is greater than PBPH's maximum drawdown of -11.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBRN and PBPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBRN | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.38% | -11.10% | -24.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.28% | -9.22% | +2.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.83% | -4.20% | -5.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | — | — |
Volatility
IBRN vs. PBPH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBRN | PBPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.66% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.29% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.38% | 16.83% | +8.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.32% | 16.83% | +8.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.32% | 16.83% | +8.49% |
IBRN vs. PBPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBRN has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than PBPH's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBRN vs. PBPH - Dividend Comparison
IBRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, more than PBPH's 0.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBRN iShares Neuroscience and Healthcare ETF | 0.95% | 0.99% | 0.40% | 0.06% |
PBPH Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBRN and PBPH have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBPH is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBPH is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IBRN.
IBRN has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.09% for PBPH.
IBRN tracks NYSE FactSet Global Neuro Biopharma and MedTech Index, while PBPH tracks BITA Global Pharma and Biotech Select Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Portfolio Building Block. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IBRN and 0.13% for PBPH.
Find the right allocation for IBRN and PBPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer