PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBOT vs. GDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IBOT vs. GDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IBOT vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IBOT
VanEck Robotics ETF
0.97%28.57%6.39%18.90%
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
7.00%154.77%10.63%-8.45%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBOT achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly lower than GDX's 7.00% return.


IBOT

1D
4.22%
1M
-12.19%
YTD
0.97%
6M
6.86%
1Y
35.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GDX

1D
6.97%
1M
-20.78%
YTD
7.00%
6M
20.99%
1Y
101.08%
3Y*
43.23%
5Y*
23.96%
10Y*
17.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IBOT vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBOT has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than GDX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IBOT vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBOT
IBOT Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
IBOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBOT Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
IBOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

GDX
GDX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
GDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
GDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBOT vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBOTGDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.40

2.21

-0.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.02

2.45

-0.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.36

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

3.34

-1.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.12

12.07

-3.95

IBOT vs. GDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBOT Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the GDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBOT and GDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBOTGDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

2.21

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.14

+0.70

Correlation

The correlation between IBOT and GDX is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

IBOT vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison

IBOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than GDX's 0.69% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBOT
VanEck Robotics ETF
0.38%0.38%2.81%2.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
0.69%0.74%1.19%1.61%1.66%1.67%0.53%0.67%0.50%0.76%0.26%0.85%

Drawdowns

IBOT vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBOT drawdown since its inception was -25.39%, smaller than the maximum GDX drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBOT and GDX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IBOTGDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.39%

-80.34%

+54.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.74%

-30.84%

+14.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.23%

-20.78%

+7.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.18%

-40.61%

+35.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.19%

8.52%

-4.33%

Volatility

IBOT vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT) is 9.33%, while VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a volatility of 18.51%. This indicates that IBOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IBOTGDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.33%

18.51%

-9.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.61%

38.19%

-21.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.61%

46.00%

-20.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.78%

35.73%

-13.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.78%

37.44%

-15.66%