IBOT vs. AIPO

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

IBOT (VanEck Robotics ETF) and AIPO (Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBOT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar® Robotics Index, while AIPO is a Building & Construction fund tracking the MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBOT charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for AIPO.

Performance

IBOT vs. AIPO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBOT achieves a 24.30% return, which is significantly lower than AIPO's 42.18% return.

IBOT

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 1.22%
• YTD: 24.30%
• 6M: 24.91%
• 1Y: 50.85%
• 3Y*: 20.68%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AIPO

• 1D: 1.81%
• 1M: -2.51%
• YTD: 42.18%
• 6M: 37.77%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBOT vs. AIPO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IBOT VanEck Robotics ETF	24.30%	10.66%
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF	42.18%	9.46%

Correlation

The correlation between IBOT and AIPO is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025	0.75

IBOT vs. AIPO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IBOT	AIPO
Technology	52.0%	19.8%
Industrials	42.9%	54.2%
Energy	2.3%	6.0%
Consumer Cyclical	2.2%	-
Healthcare	0.8%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	0.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	4.8%
Real Estate	-	1.0%
Utilities	-	13.5%

Return for Risk

IBOT vs. AIPO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBOT

IBOT Risk / Return Rank: 71
IBOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
IBOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
IBOT Omega Ratio Rank: 70
IBOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
IBOT Martin Ratio Rank: 72

AIPO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBOT vs. AIPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IBOT	AIPO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.10	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.80	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.89	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.67	—	—

Drawdowns

IBOT vs. AIPO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBOT drawdown since its inception was -25.39%, which is greater than AIPO's maximum drawdown of -17.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBOT and AIPO.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBOT	AIPO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.39%	-17.31%	-8.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.92%	-7.53%	+4.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.02%	-4.48%	-0.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.13%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IBOT	AIPO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.29%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.07%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.06%	35.17%	-12.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.37%	35.17%	-12.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.37%	35.17%	-12.80%

IBOT vs. AIPO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBOT has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than AIPO's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

IBOT vs. AIPO - Dividend Comparison

IBOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, more than AIPO's 0.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%
IBOT VanEck Robotics ETF	0.31%	0.38%	2.81%	2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBOT and AIPO in my portfolio?

IBOT and AIPO have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IBOT or AIPO?

On fees, IBOT is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBOT or AIPO?

IBOT is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIPO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBOT or AIPO?

IBOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.31%, compared with 0.01% for AIPO.

What is the main difference between IBOT and AIPO?

IBOT is categorized as Technology Equities, while AIPO is Building & Construction. IBOT tracks BlueStar® Robotics Index, while AIPO tracks MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IBOT and 0.69% for AIPO.