IBMT vs. WTIU
IBMT (iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Muni Bond ETF) and WTIU (MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - IBMT is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Dec 2031 Index, while WTIU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBMT returned 3.08% vs 114.64% for WTIU. Their -0.21 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. IBMT charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for WTIU.
Performance
IBMT vs. WTIU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBMT achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than WTIU's 104.80% return.
IBMT
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -1.16%
- 6M
- -0.51%
- YTD
- 0.37%
- 1Y
- 3.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.63%
WTIU
- 1D
- 3.15%
- 1M
- 45.95%
- 6M
- 51.31%
- YTD
- 104.80%
- 1Y
- 114.64%
- 3Y*
- 0.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -4.45%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.12M | $1.36M | $1.09M | |
| $1.32M | $870.89K | $849.27K |
IBMT vs. WTIU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBMT iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Muni Bond ETF | 0.37% | 7.26% |
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN | 104.80% | -29.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBMT and WTIU is -0.29, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2025 | -0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBMT vs. WTIU — Risk / Return Rank
IBMT
WTIU
IBMT vs. WTIU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMT) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBMT | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.24 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 2.09 | -0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.33 | 4.79 | -1.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBMT vs. WTIU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBMT drawdown since its inception was -3.18%, smaller than the maximum WTIU drawdown of -75.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBMT and WTIU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBMT | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.18% | -75.73% | +72.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.10% | -48.11% | +45.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -75.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.47% | -27.41% | +25.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.76% | -39.21% | +38.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.12% | 21.07% | -19.95% |
Volatility
IBMT vs. WTIU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMT) is 0.65%, while MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) has a volatility of 21.18%. This indicates that IBMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WTIU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBMT | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.65% | 21.18% | -20.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.38% | 57.82% | -55.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.05% | 69.90% | -66.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.84% | 70.86% | -67.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.84% | 70.86% | -67.02% |
IBMT vs. WTIU - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBMT has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than WTIU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBMT vs. WTIU - Dividend Comparison
IBMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, while WTIU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
IBMT iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Muni Bond ETF | 3.25% | 2.98% |
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBMT and WTIU have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WTIU has higher volatility (21.18%) compared to IBMT (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBMT dropped -3.18% vs WTIU's -75.73%.
On 1-year performance, WTIU leads with 114.64% vs 3.08% for IBMT. On fees, IBMT is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IBMT has been the lower-risk option at 0.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, WTIU has performed better with a 114.64% return vs 3.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBMT is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for WTIU.
IBMT has the higher dividend yield at 3.25%, compared with 0.00% for WTIU.
IBMT is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while WTIU is Leveraged Equities. IBMT tracks S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Dec 2031 Index, while WTIU tracks Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IBMT and 0.95% for WTIU.
WTIU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBMT and WTIU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer