IBMR vs. TAXS
IBMR (iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF) and TAXS (Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - IBMR tracks the S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted 2029 Index while TAXS tracks the ICE Short Term Focused Municipal Bond Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBMR charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for TAXS.
Performance
IBMR vs. TAXS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBMR achieves a 0.71% return, which is significantly lower than TAXS's 0.93% return.
IBMR
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 1.17%
- 1Y
- 4.07%
- 3Y*
- 3.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TAXS
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 1.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBMR vs. TAXS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBMR iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF | 0.71% | 0.89% |
TAXS Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 0.93% | 1.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBMR and TAXS is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBMR vs. TAXS — Risk / Return Rank
IBMR
TAXS
IBMR vs. TAXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMR) and Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBMR | TAXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.33 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.44 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.03 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBMR | TAXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 2.78 | -1.85 |
Drawdowns
IBMR vs. TAXS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBMR drawdown since its inception was -4.83%, which is greater than TAXS's maximum drawdown of -0.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBMR and TAXS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBMR | TAXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.83% | -0.84% | -3.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.68% | -0.09% | -0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.02% | -0.24% | -0.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.58% | — | — |
Volatility
IBMR vs. TAXS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBMR | TAXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.44% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.14% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75% | 1.00% | +0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.07% | 1.00% | +2.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.07% | 1.00% | +2.07% |
IBMR vs. TAXS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBMR has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than TAXS's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBMR vs. TAXS - Dividend Comparison
IBMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, more than TAXS's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBMR iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF | 2.55% | 2.55% | 2.53% | 1.27% |
TAXS Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 1.83% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBMR and TAXS have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TAXS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TAXS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IBMR.
IBMR has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 1.83% for TAXS.
IBMR tracks S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted 2029 Index, while TAXS tracks ICE Short Term Focused Municipal Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IBMR and 0.05% for TAXS.
Find the right allocation for IBMR and TAXS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer