IBMR vs. FBDC

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

IBMR (iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF) and FBDC (FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBMR is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted 2029 Index, while FBDC is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by First Trust. IBMR is passively managed, while FBDC is actively managed. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBMR charges 0.18%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for FBDC.

Performance

IBMR vs. FBDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMR) and FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBMR achieves a 0.71% return, which is significantly higher than FBDC's -9.51% return.

IBMR

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 0.71%
• 6M: 1.17%
• 1Y: 4.07%
• 3Y*: 3.48%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBDC

• 1D: -2.98%
• 1M: -7.81%
• YTD: -9.51%
• 6M: -10.31%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBMR vs. FBDC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
IBMR iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF	0.71%	2.32%
FBDC FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF	-9.51%	-2.43%

Correlation

The correlation between IBMR and FBDC is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025	0.03

Return for Risk

IBMR vs. FBDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBMR

IBMR Risk / Return Rank: 64
IBMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
IBMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
IBMR Omega Ratio Rank: 82
IBMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
IBMR Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBMR vs. FBDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMR) and FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IBMR	FBDC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.44	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.63	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.03	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IBMR	FBDC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.33	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.93	-0.70	+1.63

Drawdowns

IBMR vs. FBDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBMR drawdown since its inception was -4.83%, smaller than the maximum FBDC drawdown of -20.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBMR and FBDC.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBMR	FBDC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.83%	-20.60%	+15.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.55%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.72%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.68%	-17.24%	+16.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.02%	-10.14%	+9.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.58%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IBMR	FBDC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.44%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.14%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.75%	18.06%	-16.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.07%	18.06%	-14.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.07%	18.06%	-14.99%

IBMR vs. FBDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBMR has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FBDC's 1.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

IBMR vs. FBDC - Dividend Comparison

IBMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, less than FBDC's 11.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FBDC FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF	11.52%	5.41%	0.00%	0.00%
IBMR iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF	2.55%	2.55%	2.53%	1.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBMR and FBDC in my portfolio?

IBMR and FBDC have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IBMR or FBDC?

On fees, IBMR is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBMR or FBDC?

IBMR is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for FBDC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBMR or FBDC?

FBDC has the higher dividend yield at 11.52%, compared with 2.55% for IBMR.

What is the main difference between IBMR and FBDC?

IBMR is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while FBDC is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IBMR and 1.35% for FBDC.