IBMR vs. BSMQ

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

IBMR (iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF) and BSMQ (Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - IBMR tracks the S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted 2029 Index while BSMQ tracks the Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2026 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IBMR returned 3.48%/yr vs 2.92%/yr for BSMQ. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.18% expense ratio.

Performance

IBMR vs. BSMQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMR) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IBMR having a 0.71% return and BSMQ slightly higher at 0.73%.

IBMR

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 0.71%
• 6M: 1.17%
• 1Y: 4.07%
• 3Y*: 3.48%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BSMQ

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.14%
• YTD: 0.73%
• 6M: 1.17%
• 1Y: 3.08%
• 3Y*: 2.92%
• 5Y*: 0.29%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBMR vs. BSMQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
IBMR iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF	0.71%	4.45%	0.06%	3.46%
BSMQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF	0.73%	3.12%	1.99%	2.15%

Correlation

The correlation between IBMR and BSMQ is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2023	0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between IBMR and BSMQ has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

IBMR vs. BSMQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBMR

IBMR Risk / Return Rank: 64
IBMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
IBMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
IBMR Omega Ratio Rank: 82
IBMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
IBMR Martin Ratio Rank: 42

BSMQ

BSMQ Risk / Return Rank: 85
BSMQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
BSMQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
BSMQ Omega Ratio Rank: 81
BSMQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
BSMQ Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBMR vs. BSMQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMR) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IBMR	BSMQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	2.32	+0.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.44	3.68	-0.25
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.48	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.63	9.43	-6.80
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.03	24.69	-17.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IBMR vs. BSMQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBMR Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the BSMQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBMR and BSMQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IBMR	BSMQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.33	2.32	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.11	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.93	0.25	+0.68

Drawdowns

IBMR vs. BSMQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBMR drawdown since its inception was -4.83%, smaller than the maximum BSMQ drawdown of -13.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBMR and BSMQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBMR	BSMQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.83%	-13.18%	+8.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.55%	-0.33%	-1.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.72%	-2.53%	-2.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-11.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.68%	-0.12%	-0.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.02%	-3.48%	+2.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.58%	0.12%	+0.46%

Volatility

IBMR vs. BSMQ - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMR) has a higher volatility of 0.44% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMQ) at 0.39%. This indicates that IBMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSMQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IBMR	BSMQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.44%	0.39%	+0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.14%	0.94%	+0.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.75%	1.33%	+0.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.07%	2.68%	+0.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.07%	4.79%	-1.72%

IBMR vs. BSMQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IBMR and BSMQ have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IBMR vs. BSMQ - Dividend Comparison

IBMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, less than BSMQ's 2.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BSMQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF	2.76%	2.74%	2.75%	2.47%	1.60%	1.14%	1.57%	0.44%
IBMR iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF	2.55%	2.55%	2.53%	1.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBMR and BSMQ in my portfolio?

IBMR and BSMQ have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IBMR or BSMQ?

IBMR has higher volatility (0.44%) compared to BSMQ (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBMR dropped -4.83% vs BSMQ's -13.18%.

Which ETF is better, IBMR or BSMQ?

On 3-year performance, IBMR leads with 3.48% vs 2.92% for BSMQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IBMR or BSMQ?

Over the 3-year period, IBMR has performed better with a 3.48% return vs 2.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBMR or BSMQ?

IBMR and BSMQ have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBMR or BSMQ?

BSMQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 2.55% for IBMR.

What is the main difference between IBMR and BSMQ?

IBMR tracks S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted 2029 Index, while BSMQ tracks Invesco BulletShares Municipal Bond 2026 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.