IBMQ vs. UXRP
IBMQ (iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Muni Bond ETF) and UXRP (ProShares Ultra XRP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBMQ is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted Dec 2028 Index, while UXRP is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg XRP Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBMQ returned 2.02% vs -94.69% for UXRP. Their 0.06 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. IBMQ charges 0.18%/yr vs 1.67%/yr for UXRP.
Performance
IBMQ vs. UXRP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBMQ achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly higher than UXRP's -77.99% return.
IBMQ
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- 6M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 2.02%
- 3Y*
- 2.88%
- 5Y*
- 0.35%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.95%
UXRP
- 1D
- -5.41%
- 1M
- -7.09%
- 6M
- -74.16%
- YTD
- -77.99%
- 1Y
- -94.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -94.38%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.97M | $1.98M | $1.89M | |
| $852.19K | $746.96K | $1.32M |
IBMQ vs. UXRP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBMQ iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Muni Bond ETF | 0.90% | 1.68% |
UXRP ProShares Ultra XRP ETF | -77.99% | -77.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBMQ and UXRP is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBMQ vs. UXRP — Risk / Return Rank
IBMQ
UXRP
IBMQ vs. UXRP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMQ) and ProShares Ultra XRP ETF (UXRP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBMQ | UXRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 0.79 | +0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | -0.99 | +3.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.46 | -1.23 | +6.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBMQ vs. UXRP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBMQ drawdown since its inception was -15.85%, smaller than the maximum UXRP drawdown of -96.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBMQ and UXRP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBMQ | UXRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.85% | -96.60% | +80.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.13% | -95.74% | +94.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | -96.51% | +96.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.19% | -74.97% | +71.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.43% | 76.79% | -76.36% |
Volatility
IBMQ vs. UXRP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMQ) is 0.37%, while ProShares Ultra XRP ETF (UXRP) has a volatility of 24.70%. This indicates that IBMQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UXRP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBMQ | UXRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.37% | 24.70% | -24.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.88% | 101.23% | -100.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22% | 142.99% | -141.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.94% | 143.51% | -140.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.49% | 143.51% | -138.02% |
IBMQ vs. UXRP - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBMQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than UXRP's 1.67% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBMQ vs. UXRP - Dividend Comparison
IBMQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, more than UXRP's 0.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBMQ iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Muni Bond ETF | 2.24% | 2.43% | 2.33% | 1.93% | 1.25% | 1.05% | 1.24% | 1.03% |
UXRP ProShares Ultra XRP ETF | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBMQ and UXRP have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UXRP has higher volatility (24.70%) compared to IBMQ (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBMQ dropped -15.85% vs UXRP's -96.60%.
On 1-year performance, IBMQ leads with 2.02% vs -94.69% for UXRP. On fees, IBMQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IBMQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBMQ has performed better with a 2.02% return vs -94.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBMQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.67% for UXRP.
IBMQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 0.02% for UXRP.
IBMQ is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while UXRP is Leveraged Cryptocurrency. IBMQ tracks S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted Dec 2028 Index, while UXRP tracks Bloomberg XRP Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IBMQ and 1.67% for UXRP.
IBMQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBMQ and UXRP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer