IBMQ vs. RTAI
IBMQ (iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Muni Bond ETF) and RTAI (Rareview Tax Advantaged Income ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. IBMQ is passively managed, while RTAI is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, IBMQ returned 0.55%/yr vs -0.71%/yr for RTAI. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBMQ charges 0.18%/yr vs 3.78%/yr for RTAI.
Performance
IBMQ vs. RTAI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBMQ achieves a 0.93% return, which is significantly lower than RTAI's 3.90% return.
IBMQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 1.12%
- 1Y
- 3.24%
- 3Y*
- 2.84%
- 5Y*
- 0.55%
- 10Y*
- —
RTAI
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 3.23%
- YTD
- 3.90%
- 6M
- 4.64%
- 1Y
- 11.68%
- 3Y*
- 7.08%
- 5Y*
- -0.71%
- 10Y*
- —
IBMQ vs. RTAI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBMQ iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Muni Bond ETF | 0.93% | 4.09% | 0.71% | 4.00% | -6.73% | -0.26% | 2.08% |
RTAI Rareview Tax Advantaged Income ETF | 3.90% | 5.54% | 7.17% | 4.33% | -22.55% | 10.62% | 5.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBMQ and RTAI is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2020 | 0.51 |
The correlation between IBMQ and RTAI shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBMQ vs. RTAI — Risk / Return Rank
IBMQ
RTAI
IBMQ vs. RTAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMQ) and Rareview Tax Advantaged Income ETF (RTAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBMQ | RTAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.35 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 1.90 | +0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.58 | 7.69 | -0.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBMQ vs. RTAI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBMQ drawdown since its inception was -15.85%, smaller than the maximum RTAI drawdown of -34.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBMQ and RTAI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBMQ | RTAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.85% | -34.32% | +18.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.13% | -6.18% | +5.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.57% | -15.71% | +12.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.51% | -34.32% | +22.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | -6.33% | +6.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.23% | -13.76% | +10.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.43% | 1.52% | -1.09% |
Volatility
IBMQ vs. RTAI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMQ) is 0.26%, while Rareview Tax Advantaged Income ETF (RTAI) has a volatility of 2.02%. This indicates that IBMQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RTAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBMQ | RTAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.26% | 2.02% | -1.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.87% | 5.47% | -4.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19% | 6.72% | -5.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.95% | 9.36% | -6.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.53% | 9.03% | -3.50% |
IBMQ vs. RTAI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBMQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than RTAI's 3.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBMQ vs. RTAI - Dividend Comparison
IBMQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, less than RTAI's 4.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBMQ iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Muni Bond ETF | 2.44% | 2.43% | 2.33% | 1.93% | 1.25% | 1.05% | 1.24% | 1.03% |
RTAI Rareview Tax Advantaged Income ETF | 4.98% | 5.66% | 5.02% | 3.07% | 3.71% | 4.73% | 0.48% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBMQ and RTAI have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RTAI has higher volatility (2.02%) compared to IBMQ (0.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBMQ dropped -15.85% vs RTAI's -34.32%.
On 5-year performance, IBMQ leads with 0.55% vs -0.71% for RTAI. On fees, IBMQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IBMQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IBMQ has performed better with a 0.55% return vs -0.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBMQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 3.78% for RTAI.
RTAI has the higher dividend yield at 4.98%, compared with 2.44% for IBMQ.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Rareview Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IBMQ and 3.78% for RTAI.
IBMQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBMQ and RTAI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer