IBMO vs. THYM
IBMO (iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF) and THYM (T. Rowe Price High Income Municipal ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBMO is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted Dec 2026 Index, while THYM is a High Yield Muni fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. IBMO is passively managed, while THYM is actively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBMO charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for THYM.
Performance
IBMO vs. THYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBMO achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly lower than THYM's 3.96% return.
IBMO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- 2.35%
- 3Y*
- 2.77%
- 5Y*
- 0.62%
- 10Y*
- —
THYM
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- 6M
- 3.28%
- YTD
- 3.96%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBMO vs. THYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBMO iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF | 1.10% | 0.30% |
THYM T. Rowe Price High Income Municipal ETF | 3.96% | 0.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBMO and THYM is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBMO vs. THYM — Risk / Return Rank
IBMO
THYM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IBMO vs. THYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMO) and T. Rowe Price High Income Municipal ETF (THYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBMO | THYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.23 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.40 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBMO vs. THYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBMO drawdown since its inception was -14.77%, which is greater than THYM's maximum drawdown of -2.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBMO and THYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBMO | THYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.77% | -2.93% | -11.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -0.68% | +0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.29% | -0.46% | -1.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.13% | — | — |
Volatility
IBMO vs. THYM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBMO | THYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.31% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.71% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13% | 4.31% | -3.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.14% | 4.31% | -2.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.49% | 4.31% | +0.18% |
IBMO vs. THYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBMO has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than THYM's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBMO vs. THYM - Dividend Comparison
IBMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, less than THYM's 2.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBMO iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF | 2.40% | 2.37% | 2.15% | 1.65% | 0.89% | 0.62% | 1.03% | 1.01% |
THYM T. Rowe Price High Income Municipal ETF | 2.56% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBMO and THYM have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBMO is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBMO is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for THYM.
THYM has the higher dividend yield at 2.56%, compared with 2.40% for IBMO.
IBMO is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while THYM is High Yield Muni. They also come from different issuers: iShares and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IBMO and 0.32% for THYM.
Find the right allocation for IBMO and THYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer