IBMO vs. RNIN
IBMO (iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF) and RNIN (Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IBMO is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Callable-Adjusted Dec 2026 Index, while RNIN is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Bushido. IBMO is passively managed, while RNIN is actively managed. Over the past year, IBMO returned 2.35% vs 28.59% for RNIN. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. IBMO charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for RNIN.
Performance
IBMO vs. RNIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBMO achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly lower than RNIN's 21.76% return.
IBMO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- 2.35%
- 3Y*
- 2.77%
- 5Y*
- 0.62%
- 10Y*
- —
RNIN
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 3.89%
- 6M
- 19.31%
- YTD
- 21.76%
- 1Y
- 28.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBMO vs. RNIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBMO iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF | 1.10% | 2.15% |
RNIN Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF | 21.76% | 10.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBMO and RNIN is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2025 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBMO vs. RNIN — Risk / Return Rank
IBMO
RNIN
IBMO vs. RNIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMO) and Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF (RNIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBMO | RNIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.33 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.23 | 5.04 | +1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.40 | 16.70 | +1.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBMO vs. RNIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBMO drawdown since its inception was -14.77%, which is greater than RNIN's maximum drawdown of -5.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBMO and RNIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBMO | RNIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.77% | -5.70% | -9.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.38% | -5.70% | +5.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -0.90% | +0.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.29% | -1.28% | -1.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.13% | 1.72% | -1.59% |
Volatility
IBMO vs. RNIN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMO) is 0.31%, while Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF (RNIN) has a volatility of 4.98%. This indicates that IBMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RNIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBMO | RNIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.31% | 4.98% | -4.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.71% | 11.23% | -10.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13% | 15.32% | -14.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.14% | 15.09% | -12.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.49% | 15.09% | -10.60% |
IBMO vs. RNIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBMO has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than RNIN's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBMO vs. RNIN - Dividend Comparison
IBMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, more than RNIN's 0.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBMO iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Muni Bond ETF | 2.40% | 2.37% | 2.15% | 1.65% | 0.89% | 0.62% | 1.03% | 1.01% |
RNIN Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF | 0.85% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBMO and RNIN have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RNIN has higher volatility (4.98%) compared to IBMO (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBMO dropped -14.77% vs RNIN's -5.70%.
On 1-year performance, RNIN leads with 28.59% vs 2.35% for IBMO. On fees, IBMO is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IBMO has been the lower-risk option at 0.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RNIN has performed better with a 28.59% return vs 2.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBMO is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for RNIN.
IBMO has the higher dividend yield at 2.40%, compared with 0.85% for RNIN.
IBMO is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while RNIN is Mid Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Bushido. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IBMO and 0.68% for RNIN.
IBMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBMO and RNIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer