PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBMN vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IBMN vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMN) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IBMN vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IBMN
iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF
0.00%2.49%2.58%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-22.62%-6.41%99.21%

Returns By Period


IBMN

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.38%
1Y
1.62%
3Y*
2.01%
5Y*
0.57%
10Y*

IBIT

1D
1.96%
1M
3.31%
YTD
-22.62%
6M
-40.89%
1Y
-17.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IBMN vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBMN has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

IBMN vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBMN
IBMN Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
IBMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBMN Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
IBMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBMN Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBMN vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMN) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBMNIBITDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.06

-0.40

+1.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.59

-0.29

+1.88

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

0.97

+0.44

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

-0.39

+2.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

22.84

-0.83

+23.67

IBMN vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBMN Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBMN and IBIT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBMNIBITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

-0.40

+1.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.35

+0.24

Correlation

The correlation between IBMN and IBIT is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

IBMN vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

IBMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IBMN
iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF
1.68%2.03%2.03%1.72%0.97%0.70%1.11%1.65%0.23%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IBMN vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBMN drawdown since its inception was -12.40%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBMN and IBIT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IBMNIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.40%

-49.36%

+36.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.09%

-49.36%

+48.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-46.11%

+46.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.85%

-14.13%

+12.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.10%

23.09%

-22.99%

Volatility

IBMN vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMN) is 0.00%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 12.99%. This indicates that IBMN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IBMNIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

12.99%

-12.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.59%

36.75%

-36.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91%

45.42%

-43.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.82%

51.26%

-49.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.94%

51.26%

-47.32%