IBMN vs. ACWI
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMN) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI).
IBMN and ACWI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IBMN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Dec 2025 Index. It was launched on Nov 13, 2018. ACWI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Country World Index. It was launched on Mar 26, 2008. Both IBMN and ACWI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IBMN vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IBMN vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBMN iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF | 0.00% | 2.49% | 2.33% | 2.42% | -4.43% | -0.41% | 4.83% | 6.87% | 2.91% |
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | -2.21% | 22.41% | 17.45% | 22.27% | -18.39% | 18.66% | 16.34% | 26.59% | -6.70% |
Returns By Period
IBMN
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- 1.62%
- 3Y*
- 2.01%
- 5Y*
- 0.57%
- 10Y*
- —
ACWI
- 1D
- 3.11%
- 1M
- -6.11%
- YTD
- -2.21%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 20.86%
- 3Y*
- 16.98%
- 5Y*
- 9.40%
- 10Y*
- 11.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IBMN vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBMN has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IBMN vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank
IBMN
ACWI
IBMN vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMN) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBMN | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.06 | 1.20 | -0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.59 | 1.77 | -0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.27 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | 1.79 | +0.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.84 | 8.26 | +14.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBMN | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 1.20 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.59 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.39 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between IBMN and ACWI is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
IBMN vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison
IBMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, more than ACWI's 1.59% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBMN iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF | 1.68% | 2.03% | 2.03% | 1.72% | 0.97% | 0.70% | 1.11% | 1.65% | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 1.59% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.43% | 2.33% | 2.18% | 1.94% | 2.19% | 2.56% |
Drawdowns
IBMN vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBMN drawdown since its inception was -12.40%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBMN and ACWI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBMN | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.40% | -56.00% | +43.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.09% | -11.76% | +10.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.36% | -26.42% | +19.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -6.92% | +6.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.85% | -8.69% | +6.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.10% | 2.54% | -2.44% |
Volatility
IBMN vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMN) is 0.00%, while iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has a volatility of 6.38%. This indicates that IBMN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IBMN | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 6.38% | -6.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.59% | 10.05% | -9.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91% | 17.48% | -15.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.82% | 15.97% | -14.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.94% | 17.08% | -13.14% |