IBMM vs. MINN

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IBMM (iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF) and MINN (Mairs & Power Minnesota Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. IBMM is passively managed, while MINN is actively managed. IBMM charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for MINN.

Performance

IBMM vs. MINN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM) and Mairs & Power Minnesota Municipal Bond ETF (MINN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IBMM

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MINN

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 0.56%
• 6M: 1.15%
• 1Y: 6.52%
• 3Y*: 3.59%
• 5Y*: -0.27%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBMM vs. MINN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
IBMM iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF	0.00%
MINN Mairs & Power Minnesota Municipal Bond ETF	-0.20%

Return for Risk

IBMM vs. MINN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MINN

MINN Risk / Return Rank: 46
MINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
MINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
MINN Omega Ratio Rank: 46
MINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
MINN Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBMM vs. MINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM) and Mairs & Power Minnesota Municipal Bond ETF (MINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IBMM	MINN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.51	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.05	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	-0.01	—

Drawdowns

IBMM vs. MINN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBMM drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum MINN drawdown of -18.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBMM and MINN.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBMM	MINN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-18.37%	+18.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.82%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-6.77%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.37%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.41%	+2.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-7.78%	+7.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.88%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IBMM	MINN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.01%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.60%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	4.33%	-4.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	5.09%	-5.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	4.98%	-4.98%

IBMM vs. MINN - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBMM has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than MINN's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

IBMM vs. MINN - Dividend Comparison

IBMM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
IBMM iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MINN Mairs & Power Minnesota Municipal Bond ETF	2.99%	2.94%	2.65%	1.80%	1.34%	0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, IBMM or MINN?

On fees, IBMM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IBMM or MINN?

IBMM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for MINN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IBMM or MINN?

MINN has the higher dividend yield at 2.99%, compared with 0.00% for IBMM.

What is the main difference between IBMM and MINN?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Mairs & Power. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IBMM and 0.25% for MINN.