IBMM vs. FMUN
IBMM (iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF) and FMUN (Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. IBMM is passively managed, while FMUN is actively managed. IBMM charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for FMUN.
Performance
IBMM vs. FMUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IBMM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FMUN
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- 7.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBMM vs. FMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IBMM iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF | 0.00% |
FMUN Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF | 0.46% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBMM vs. FMUN — Risk / Return Rank
IBMM
FMUN
IBMM vs. FMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM) and Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF (FMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBMM | FMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.27 | — |
Drawdowns
IBMM vs. FMUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBMM drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum FMUN drawdown of -3.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBMM and FMUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBMM | FMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -3.21% | +3.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.72% | +0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -0.82% | +0.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.97% | — |
Volatility
IBMM vs. FMUN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBMM | FMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.27% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 3.12% | -3.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 4.06% | -4.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 4.06% | -4.06% |
IBMM vs. FMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBMM has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than FMUN's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBMM vs. FMUN - Dividend Comparison
IBMM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FMUN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FMUN Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF | 3.29% | 2.41% |
IBMM iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, FMUN is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FMUN is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IBMM.
FMUN has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 0.00% for IBMM.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IBMM and 0.05% for FMUN.
Find the right allocation for IBMM and FMUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer