PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBM vs. USO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBM vs. USO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBM achieves a 4.53% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 103.67% return. Over the past 10 years, IBM has outperformed USO with an annualized return of 12.25%, while USO has yielded a comparatively lower 4.07% annualized return.


IBM

1D
-7.17%
1M
34.16%
YTD
4.53%
6M
2.32%
1Y
18.19%
3Y*
36.49%
5Y*
21.40%
10Y*
12.25%

USO

1D
2.62%
1M
-4.57%
YTD
103.67%
6M
99.35%
1Y
101.55%
3Y*
29.98%
5Y*
24.41%
10Y*
4.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBM vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBM
International Business Machines Corporation
4.53%38.23%39.27%21.85%10.64%16.65%-1.16%23.58%-22.56%-3.99%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
103.67%-8.46%13.35%-4.94%28.97%64.68%-67.79%32.61%-19.57%2.47%

Correlation

The correlation between IBM and USO is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2006

0.20

The correlation between IBM and USO shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBM vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBM
IBM Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
IBM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBM Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IBM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBM Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

USO
USO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
USO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
USO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
USO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
USO Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBM vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBMUSODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.38

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.59

5.01

-4.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.29

9.42

-8.13

IBM vs. USO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBM Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the USO Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBM and USO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBMUSODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

2.31

-1.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.68

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.10

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

-0.18

+0.48

Drawdowns

IBM vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBM drawdown since its inception was -69.40%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBM and USO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBMUSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.40%

-98.19%

+28.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.96%

-20.39%

-10.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.96%

-26.05%

-4.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.96%

-36.23%

+5.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.59%

-86.75%

+46.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.17%

-85.01%

+77.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.12%

-75.30%

+55.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.16%

10.82%

+3.34%

Volatility

IBM vs. USO - Volatility Comparison

International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) has a higher volatility of 20.58% compared to United States Oil Fund LP (USO) at 14.87%. This indicates that IBM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBMUSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.58%

14.87%

+5.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.08%

38.23%

-4.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.99%

44.20%

-5.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.03%

36.06%

-9.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.51%

39.00%

-12.49%

Dividends

IBM vs. USO - Dividend Comparison

IBM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBM
International Business Machines Corporation
2.20%2.27%3.03%4.05%4.68%4.74%5.17%4.80%5.46%3.85%3.31%3.63%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBM and USO have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBM has higher volatility (20.58%) compared to USO (14.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBM dropped -69.40% vs USO's -98.19%.

USO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBM and USO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer