IBM vs. T
IBM (International Business Machines Corporation) and T (AT&T Inc.) are both stocks. IBM operates in Information Technology Services (Technology), while T operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, IBM returned 7.64%/yr vs 2.10%/yr for T. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IBM vs. T - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBM achieves a -27.15% return, which is significantly lower than T's -7.04% return. Over the past 10 years, IBM has outperformed T with an annualized return of 7.64%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 2.10% annualized return.
IBM
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -14.49%
- 6M
- -29.40%
- YTD
- -27.15%
- 1Y
- -23.58%
- 3Y*
- 19.09%
- 5Y*
- 13.91%
- 10Y*
- 7.64%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.00%
T
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 2.62%
- 6M
- -2.84%
- YTD
- -7.04%
- 1Y
- -13.37%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 7.13%
- 10Y*
- 2.10%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.35%
IBM vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBM International Business Machines Corporation | -27.15% | 38.23% | 39.27% | 21.85% | 10.64% | 16.65% | -1.16% | 23.58% | -22.56% | -3.99% |
T AT&T Inc. | -7.04% | 13.97% | 44.08% | -2.74% | 5.76% | -8.09% | -21.37% | 45.55% | -22.25% | -4.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBM and T is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 1984 | 0.32 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IBM and T has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.32, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
IBM:
$200.20B
T:
$152.52B
IBM:
$11.31
T:
$3.05
IBM:
18.84
T:
7.19
IBM:
0.23
T:
0.30
IBM:
2.94
T:
1.25
IBM:
$68.91B
T:
$125.65B
IBM:
$40.64B
T:
$105.41B
IBM:
$15.71B
T:
$54.70B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBM vs. T — Risk / Return Rank
IBM
T
IBM vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBM | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 0.92 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.66 | -0.46 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.53 | -1.03 | -0.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBM vs. T - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBM drawdown since its inception was -69.40%, which is greater than T's maximum drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBM and T.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBM | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.40% | -64.15% | -5.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.85% | -28.89% | -6.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.85% | -28.89% | -6.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.85% | -32.01% | -3.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.59% | -42.35% | +1.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.30% | -21.57% | -13.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.12% | -15.74% | -4.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.44% | 12.94% | +2.50% |
Volatility
IBM vs. T - Volatility Comparison
International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) has a higher volatility of 32.02% compared to AT&T Inc. (T) at 9.59%. This indicates that IBM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBM | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.02% | 9.59% | +22.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.34% | 19.91% | +26.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.36% | 23.72% | +24.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.86% | 24.38% | +5.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.97% | 23.92% | +4.05% |
Dividends
IBM vs. T - Dividend Comparison
IBM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, less than T's 6.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 3.16% | 2.27% | 3.03% | 4.05% | 4.68% | 4.74% | 5.17% | 4.80% | 5.46% | 3.85% | 3.31% | 3.63% |
T AT&T Inc. | 6.58% | 4.47% | 4.87% | 6.62% | 6.66% | 8.46% | 7.23% | 5.22% | 7.01% | 5.04% | 4.51% | 5.46% |
Financials
IBM vs. T - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between International Business Machines Corporation and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
IBM and T have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBM has higher volatility (32.02%) compared to T (9.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBM dropped -69.40% vs T's -64.15%.
IBM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.49 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBM and T
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer