IBM vs. MMM
IBM (International Business Machines Corporation) and MMM (3M Company) are both stocks. IBM operates in Information Technology Services (Technology), while MMM operates in Conglomerates (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, IBM returned 8.61%/yr vs 5.34%/yr for MMM. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
IBM vs. MMM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBM achieves a -19.57% return, which is significantly lower than MMM's 14.43% return. Over the past 10 years, IBM has outperformed MMM with an annualized return of 8.61%, while MMM has yielded a comparatively lower 5.34% annualized return.
IBM
- 1D
- 3.91%
- 1M
- -18.78%
- 6M
- -19.05%
- YTD
- -19.57%
- 1Y
- -4.29%
- 3Y*
- 21.55%
- 5Y*
- 15.94%
- 10Y*
- 8.61%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.15%
MMM
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- 13.10%
- 6M
- 17.68%
- YTD
- 14.43%
- 1Y
- 25.00%
- 3Y*
- 31.17%
- 5Y*
- 5.57%
- 10Y*
- 5.34%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.48%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.30B | $3.13B | $2.90B | |
MMM 3M Company | $701.19M | $628.41M | $617.87M |
IBM vs. MMM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBM International Business Machines Corporation | -19.57% | 38.23% | 39.27% | 21.85% | 10.64% | 16.65% | -1.16% | 23.58% | -22.56% | -3.99% |
MMM 3M Company | 14.43% | 26.36% | 46.13% | -3.33% | -29.63% | 4.85% | 2.77% | -4.29% | -16.90% | 34.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBM and MMM is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1970 | 0.42 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IBM and MMM has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
IBM:
$221.54B
MMM:
$93.58B
IBM:
$11.27
MMM:
$5.60
IBM:
20.86
MMM:
32.41
IBM:
3.24
MMM:
3.86
IBM:
6.50
MMM:
32.43
IBM:
$69.10B
MMM:
$25.18B
IBM:
$40.57B
MMM:
$9.92B
IBM:
$14.95B
MMM:
$5.45B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBM vs. MMM — Risk / Return Rank
IBM
MMM
IBM vs. MMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and 3M Company (MMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBM | MMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.18 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 1.34 | -1.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.27 | 2.89 | -3.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBM vs. MMM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBM drawdown since its inception was -69.40%, which is greater than MMM's maximum drawdown of -59.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBM and MMM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBM | MMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.40% | -59.10% | -10.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.50% | -18.77% | -18.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.50% | -20.66% | -16.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.50% | -53.23% | +15.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.59% | -59.10% | +18.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.58% | -0.56% | -28.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.13% | -16.08% | -4.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.19% | 8.68% | +7.51% |
Volatility
IBM vs. MMM - Volatility Comparison
International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) has a higher volatility of 31.29% compared to 3M Company (MMM) at 9.75%. This indicates that IBM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBM | MMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 31.29% | 9.75% | +21.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.34% | 19.74% | +26.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.26% | 26.80% | +21.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.07% | 28.63% | +1.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.09% | 26.73% | +1.36% |
Dividends
IBM vs. MMM - Dividend Comparison
IBM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, more than MMM's 1.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 2.86% | 2.27% | 3.03% | 4.05% | 4.68% | 4.74% | 5.17% | 4.80% | 5.46% | 3.85% | 3.31% | 3.63% |
MMM 3M Company | 1.66% | 1.82% | 16.27% | 5.49% | 4.97% | 3.33% | 3.36% | 3.26% | 2.86% | 2.00% | 2.49% | 2.72% |
Financials
IBM vs. MMM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between International Business Machines Corporation and 3M Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
IBM vs. MMM - Profitability Comparison
IBM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported a gross profit of 9.91B and revenue of 17.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.7%.
MMM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, 3M Company reported a gross profit of 2.68B and revenue of 6.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.3%.
IBM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 17.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.8%.
MMM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, 3M Company reported an operating income of 984.00M and revenue of 6.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.1%.
IBM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported a net income of 2.17B and revenue of 17.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.6%.
MMM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, 3M Company reported a net income of 933.00M and revenue of 6.50B, resulting in a net margin of 14.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
IBM and MMM have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBM has higher volatility (31.29%) compared to MMM (9.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBM dropped -69.40% vs MMM's -59.10%.
MMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBM and MMM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer