IBM vs. GLW
IBM (International Business Machines Corporation) and GLW (Corning Incorporated) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — IBM in Information Technology Services, GLW in Electronic Components. Over the past 10 years, IBM returned 11.43%/yr vs 26.95%/yr for GLW. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IBM vs. GLW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBM achieves a -2.58% return, which is significantly lower than GLW's 103.50% return. Over the past 10 years, IBM has underperformed GLW with an annualized return of 11.43%, while GLW has yielded a comparatively higher 26.95% annualized return.
IBM
- 1D
- -5.61%
- 1M
- 23.97%
- YTD
- -2.58%
- 6M
- -6.29%
- 1Y
- 8.65%
- 3Y*
- 33.23%
- 5Y*
- 19.70%
- 10Y*
- 11.43%
GLW
- 1D
- -10.18%
- 1M
- -4.86%
- YTD
- 103.50%
- 6M
- 107.26%
- 1Y
- 254.02%
- 3Y*
- 82.57%
- 5Y*
- 36.01%
- 10Y*
- 26.95%
IBM vs. GLW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBM International Business Machines Corporation | -2.58% | 38.23% | 39.27% | 21.85% | 10.64% | 16.65% | -1.16% | 23.58% | -22.56% | -3.99% |
GLW Corning Incorporated | 103.50% | 87.76% | 60.64% | -1.23% | -11.56% | 5.92% | 27.57% | -1.02% | -3.28% | 34.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBM and GLW is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1982 | 0.36 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IBM and GLW has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
IBM:
$271.20B
GLW:
$153.21B
IBM:
$11.32
GLW:
$2.10
IBM:
25.16
GLW:
84.59
IBM:
0.30
GLW:
2.05
IBM:
3.93
GLW:
9.38
IBM:
8.22
GLW:
12.97
IBM:
$68.91B
GLW:
$16.32B
IBM:
$40.64B
GLW:
$5.93B
IBM:
$15.71B
GLW:
$3.77B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBM vs. GLW — Risk / Return Rank
IBM
GLW
IBM vs. GLW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and Corning Incorporated (GLW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBM | GLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.62 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.31 | 11.07 | -10.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.67 | 36.80 | -36.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBM | GLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 | 4.61 | -4.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 1.02 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.80 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.26 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
IBM vs. GLW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBM drawdown since its inception was -69.40%, smaller than the maximum GLW drawdown of -99.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBM and GLW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBM | GLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.40% | -99.02% | +29.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.96% | -23.01% | -7.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.96% | -27.57% | -3.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.96% | -34.52% | +3.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.59% | -48.80% | +8.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.48% | -14.61% | +1.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.12% | -50.52% | +30.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.20% | 6.91% | +7.29% |
Volatility
IBM vs. GLW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) is 21.74%, while Corning Incorporated (GLW) has a volatility of 25.67%. This indicates that IBM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBM | GLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.74% | 25.67% | -3.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.56% | 49.63% | -15.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.43% | 55.26% | -15.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.14% | 35.49% | -8.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.57% | 33.70% | -7.13% |
Dividends
IBM vs. GLW - Dividend Comparison
IBM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, more than GLW's 0.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLW Corning Incorporated | 0.63% | 1.28% | 2.36% | 3.68% | 3.38% | 2.58% | 2.44% | 2.75% | 2.38% | 1.94% | 2.22% | 2.63% |
IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 2.36% | 2.27% | 3.03% | 4.05% | 4.68% | 4.74% | 5.17% | 4.80% | 5.46% | 3.85% | 3.31% | 3.63% |
Financials
IBM vs. GLW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between International Business Machines Corporation and Corning Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
IBM vs. GLW - Profitability Comparison
IBM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported a gross profit of 8.95B and revenue of 15.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.2%.
GLW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corning Incorporated reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
IBM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported an operating income of 1.22B and revenue of 15.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.6%.
GLW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corning Incorporated reported an operating income of 639.00M and revenue of 4.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.4%.
IBM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported a net income of 1.22B and revenue of 15.92B, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.
GLW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Corning Incorporated reported a net income of 371.00M and revenue of 4.14B, resulting in a net margin of 9.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
IBM and GLW have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLW has higher volatility (25.67%) compared to IBM (21.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBM dropped -69.40% vs GLW's -99.02%.
GLW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.61 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBM and GLW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer