PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBM vs. DRI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IBM vs. DRI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBM achieves a -27.15% return, which is significantly lower than DRI's 8.35% return. Over the past 10 years, IBM has underperformed DRI with an annualized return of 7.64%, while DRI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.28% annualized return.


IBM

1D
0.16%
1M
-14.49%
6M
-29.40%
YTD
-27.15%
1Y
-23.58%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
13.91%
10Y*
7.64%
ALL TIME*
7.00%

DRI

1D
-1.87%
1M
-7.99%
6M
-7.79%
YTD
8.35%
1Y
-4.08%
3Y*
8.03%
5Y*
9.63%
10Y*
15.28%
ALL TIME*
14.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBM vs. DRI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBM
International Business Machines Corporation
-27.15%38.23%39.27%21.85%10.64%16.65%-1.16%23.58%-22.56%-3.99%
DRI
Darden Restaurants, Inc.
8.35%1.56%17.70%22.83%-4.84%29.48%10.45%12.29%6.89%35.99%

Correlation

The correlation between IBM and DRI is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 1995

0.28

Over the past year, the correlation between IBM and DRI has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.28, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IBM:

$200.20B

DRI:

$22.30B

EPS

IBM:

$11.31

DRI:

$10.35

PE Ratio

IBM:

18.84

DRI:

18.82

PEG Ratio

IBM:

0.23

DRI:

2.11

PS Ratio

IBM:

2.94

DRI:

1.72

PB Ratio

IBM:

6.15

DRI:

10.17

Total Revenue (TTM)

IBM:

$68.91B

DRI:

$13.21B

Gross Profit (TTM)

IBM:

$40.64B

DRI:

$9.17B

EBITDA (TTM)

IBM:

$15.71B

DRI:

$2.34B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBM vs. DRI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBM
IBM Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
IBM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBM Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
IBM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBM Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

DRI
DRI Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
DRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRI Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
DRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRI Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBM vs. DRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBMDRIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

0.99

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.66

-0.20

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.53

-0.44

-1.09

IBM vs. DRI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBM Sharpe Ratio is -0.49, which is lower than the DRI Sharpe Ratio of -0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBM and DRI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBM vs. DRI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBM drawdown since its inception was -69.40%, roughly equal to the maximum DRI drawdown of -72.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBM and DRI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBMDRIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.40%

-72.80%

+3.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.85%

-20.07%

-15.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.85%

-23.92%

-11.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.85%

-28.38%

-7.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.59%

-72.80%

+32.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.30%

-10.35%

-24.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.12%

-12.98%

-7.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.44%

9.27%

+6.17%

Volatility

IBM vs. DRI - Volatility Comparison

International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) has a higher volatility of 32.02% compared to Darden Restaurants, Inc. (DRI) at 7.63%. This indicates that IBM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBMDRIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

32.02%

7.63%

+24.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.34%

19.27%

+27.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.36%

25.80%

+22.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.86%

27.06%

+2.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.97%

35.97%

-8.00%

Dividends

IBM vs. DRI - Dividend Comparison

IBM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, which matches DRI's 3.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRI
Darden Restaurants, Inc.
3.14%3.15%2.90%3.07%3.34%2.29%0.99%2.99%2.76%2.48%2.92%13.76%
IBM
International Business Machines Corporation
3.16%2.27%3.03%4.05%4.68%4.74%5.17%4.80%5.46%3.85%3.31%3.63%

Financials

IBM vs. DRI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between International Business Machines Corporation and Darden Restaurants, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
15.92B
3.72B
(IBM) Total Revenue
(DRI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


IBM and DRI have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBM has higher volatility (32.02%) compared to DRI (7.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBM dropped -69.40% vs DRI's -72.80%.

DRI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.16 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBM and DRI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer