IBM vs. BHP
IBM (International Business Machines Corporation) and BHP (BHP Group) are both stocks. IBM operates in Information Technology Services (Technology), while BHP operates in Other Industrial Metals & Mining (Basic Materials). Over the past 10 years, IBM returned 11.34%/yr vs 21.94%/yr for BHP. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IBM vs. BHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBM achieves a -3.95% return, which is significantly lower than BHP's 41.38% return. Over the past 10 years, IBM has underperformed BHP with an annualized return of 11.34%, while BHP has yielded a comparatively higher 21.94% annualized return.
IBM
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- 22.22%
- YTD
- -3.95%
- 6M
- -7.98%
- 1Y
- 7.12%
- 3Y*
- 31.74%
- 5Y*
- 18.84%
- 10Y*
- 11.34%
BHP
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- -1.20%
- YTD
- 41.38%
- 6M
- 46.29%
- 1Y
- 75.94%
- 3Y*
- 17.37%
- 5Y*
- 14.81%
- 10Y*
- 21.94%
IBM vs. BHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBM International Business Machines Corporation | -3.95% | 38.23% | 39.27% | 21.85% | 10.64% | 16.65% | -1.16% | 23.58% | -22.56% | -3.99% |
BHP BHP Group | 41.38% | 28.91% | -24.64% | 16.50% | 44.34% | 0.91% | 25.37% | 24.50% | 10.55% | 33.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBM and BHP is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 1987 | 0.29 |
The correlation between IBM and BHP shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.33 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
IBM:
$267.37B
BHP:
$212.97B
IBM:
$11.32
BHP:
$8.51
IBM:
24.81
BHP:
9.84
IBM:
0.30
BHP:
2.72
IBM:
3.87
BHP:
1.98
IBM:
8.11
BHP:
4.23
IBM:
$68.91B
BHP:
$107.64B
IBM:
$40.64B
BHP:
$89.04B
IBM:
$15.71B
BHP:
$52.23B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBM vs. BHP — Risk / Return Rank
IBM
BHP
IBM vs. BHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) and BHP Group (BHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBM | BHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.37 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.23 | 3.86 | -3.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.50 | 14.16 | -13.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBM | BHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 | 2.41 | -2.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.46 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.68 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.32 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
IBM vs. BHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBM drawdown since its inception was -69.40%, smaller than the maximum BHP drawdown of -76.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBM and BHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBM | BHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.40% | -76.22% | +6.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.96% | -19.80% | -11.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.96% | -37.21% | +6.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.96% | -37.21% | +6.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.59% | -44.29% | +3.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.70% | -10.14% | -4.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.12% | -21.29% | +1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.23% | 5.38% | +8.85% |
Volatility
IBM vs. BHP - Volatility Comparison
International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) has a higher volatility of 21.84% compared to BHP Group (BHP) at 12.75%. This indicates that IBM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBM | BHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.84% | 12.75% | +9.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.54% | 25.95% | +8.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.53% | 31.73% | +7.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.15% | 32.31% | -5.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.59% | 32.31% | -5.72% |
Dividends
IBM vs. BHP - Dividend Comparison
IBM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, less than BHP's 3.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BHP BHP Group | 3.18% | 3.64% | 5.98% | 4.98% | 22.44% | 9.98% | 3.67% | 8.59% | 4.89% | 3.61% | 1.68% | 9.38% |
IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 2.40% | 2.27% | 3.03% | 4.05% | 4.68% | 4.74% | 5.17% | 4.80% | 5.46% | 3.85% | 3.31% | 3.63% |
Financials
IBM vs. BHP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between International Business Machines Corporation and BHP Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
IBM vs. BHP - Profitability Comparison
IBM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported a gross profit of 8.95B and revenue of 15.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.2%.
BHP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BHP Group reported a gross profit of 11.98B and revenue of 27.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.9%.
IBM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported an operating income of 1.22B and revenue of 15.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.6%.
BHP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BHP Group reported an operating income of 11.98B and revenue of 27.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.9%.
IBM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, International Business Machines Corporation reported a net income of 1.22B and revenue of 15.92B, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.
BHP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BHP Group reported a net income of 5.65B and revenue of 27.95B, resulting in a net margin of 20.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
IBM and BHP have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBM has higher volatility (21.84%) compared to BHP (12.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBM dropped -69.40% vs BHP's -76.22%.
BHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBM and BHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer