PortfoliosLab logo
IBLC vs. IGPT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between IBLC and IGPT is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

IBLC vs. IGPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) and Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

IBLC:

39.56%

IGPT:

30.57%

Max Drawdown

IBLC:

0.00%

IGPT:

-48.44%

Current Drawdown

IBLC:

0.00%

IGPT:

-14.63%

Returns By Period


IBLC

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

IGPT

YTD

-6.08%

1M

10.71%

6M

-10.96%

1Y

-2.23%

5Y*

9.06%

10Y*

14.27%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IBLC vs. IGPT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBLC has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than IGPT's 0.60% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

IBLC vs. IGPT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBLC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IBLC is 4242
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IBLC is 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IBLC is 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IBLC is 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IBLC is 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IBLC is 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

IGPT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IGPT is 1515
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IGPT is 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IGPT is 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IGPT is 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IGPT is 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IGPT is 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IBLC vs. IGPT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) and Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

IBLC vs. IGPT - Dividend Comparison

Neither IBLC nor IGPT has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
IBLC
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IGPT
Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%4.23%18.63%0.11%0.15%0.00%0.00%0.09%0.44%0.29%

Drawdowns

IBLC vs. IGPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBLC drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum IGPT drawdown of -48.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBLC and IGPT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

IBLC vs. IGPT - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...