IBLC vs. IBIT
IBLC (iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from iShares - IBLC tracks the ICE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Index while IBIT tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBLC returned 17.60% vs -44.50% for IBIT. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IBLC charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.
Performance
IBLC vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBLC achieves a 5.99% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -28.22% return.
IBLC
- 1D
- -2.87%
- 1M
- -4.33%
- 6M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 5.99%
- 1Y
- 17.60%
- 3Y*
- 26.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.35%
IBIT
- 1D
- -2.89%
- 1M
- 2.21%
- 6M
- -24.95%
- YTD
- -28.22%
- 1Y
- -44.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.01%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.30B | $1.34B | $1.68B | |
| $395.00K | $481.87K | $794.27K |
IBLC vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF | 5.99% | 27.05% | 20.96% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -28.22% | -6.41% | 89.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBLC and IBIT is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | 0.69 |
The correlation between IBLC and IBIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBLC vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
IBLC
IBIT
IBLC vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBLC | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.83 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.20 | -0.87 | +1.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.36 | -1.34 | +1.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBLC vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBLC drawdown since its inception was -62.54%, which is greater than IBIT's maximum drawdown of -53.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBLC and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBLC | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.54% | -53.30% | -9.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.94% | -53.30% | +8.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.32% | -50.01% | +19.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.78% | -18.24% | -7.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.44% | 34.66% | -10.22% |
Volatility
IBLC vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) has a higher volatility of 19.77% compared to iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) at 9.21%. This indicates that IBLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBLC | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.77% | 9.21% | +10.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.51% | 33.74% | +9.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.85% | 44.46% | +13.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.48% | 49.60% | +14.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.48% | 49.60% | +14.88% |
IBLC vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBLC has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBLC vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
IBLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF | 5.91% | 6.31% | 1.60% | 1.79% | 0.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBLC and IBIT have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBLC has higher volatility (19.77%) compared to IBIT (9.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBLC dropped -62.54% vs IBIT's -53.30%.
On 1-year performance, IBLC leads with 17.60% vs -44.50% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IBIT has been the lower-risk option at 9.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBLC has performed better with a 17.60% return vs -44.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IBLC.
IBLC has the higher dividend yield at 5.91%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.
IBLC tracks ICE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IBLC and 0.25% for IBIT.
IBLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.15 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBLC and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer