PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBLC vs. IBIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBLC vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBLC achieves a 32.34% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.37% return.


IBLC

1D
-3.00%
1M
13.52%
YTD
32.34%
6M
15.25%
1Y
73.27%
3Y*
48.31%
5Y*
10Y*

IBIC

1D
0.02%
1M
0.27%
YTD
2.37%
6M
2.51%
1Y
4.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBLC vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IBLC
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF
32.34%27.05%18.58%68.38%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
2.37%4.96%5.25%2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between IBLC and IBIC is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2023

-0.01

The correlation between IBLC and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBLC vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBLC
IBLC Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
IBLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBLC Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
IBLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBLC Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBLC vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBLCIBICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

2.24

-1.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

17.27

-15.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.26

67.45

-64.19

IBLC vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBLC Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 5.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBLC and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBLCIBICDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

5.05

-3.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

3.49

-3.09

Drawdowns

IBLC vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBLC drawdown since its inception was -62.54%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBLC and IBIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBLCIBICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.54%

-0.90%

-61.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.94%

-0.26%

-44.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.99%

-0.13%

-12.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.89%

-0.10%

-25.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.56%

0.07%

+22.49%

Volatility

IBLC vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) has a higher volatility of 14.67% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.33%. This indicates that IBLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBLCIBICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.67%

0.33%

+14.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.76%

0.67%

+40.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.94%

0.90%

+54.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.49%

1.58%

+62.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

64.49%

1.58%

+62.91%

IBLC vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBLC has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBLC vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

IBLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%, more than IBIC's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
3.59%4.43%4.65%0.83%0.00%
IBLC
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF
4.77%6.31%1.60%1.79%0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBLC and IBIC have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBLC has higher volatility (14.67%) compared to IBIC (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBLC dropped -62.54% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

On 1-year performance, IBLC leads with 73.27% vs 4.54% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBLC has performed better with a 73.27% return vs 4.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IBLC.

IBLC has the higher dividend yield at 4.77%, compared with 3.59% for IBIC.

IBLC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. IBLC tracks ICE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Index, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IBLC and 0.10% for IBIC.

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.05 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBLC and IBIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer