IBKR vs. ASML

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

IBKR (Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.) and ASML (ASML Holding N.V.) are both stocks. IBKR operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services), while ASML operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology). Over the past 10 years, IBKR returned 26.54%/yr vs 36.00%/yr for ASML. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

IBKR vs. ASML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBKR achieves a 41.50% return, which is significantly lower than ASML's 74.80% return. Over the past 10 years, IBKR has underperformed ASML with an annualized return of 26.54%, while ASML has yielded a comparatively higher 36.00% annualized return.

IBKR

• 1D: 2.23%
• 1M: 2.97%
• YTD: 41.50%
• 6M: 41.85%
• 1Y: 80.51%
• 3Y*: 67.33%
• 5Y*: 41.64%
• 10Y*: 26.54%

ASML

• 1D: -1.89%
• 1M: 17.61%
• YTD: 74.80%
• 6M: 73.02%
• 1Y: 146.81%
• 3Y*: 37.59%
• 5Y*: 22.97%
• 10Y*: 36.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBKR vs. ASML - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IBKR Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.	41.50%	46.37%	114.43%	15.14%	-8.35%	31.12%	31.71%	-14.01%	-7.13%	63.75%
ASML ASML Holding N.V.	74.80%	56.51%	-7.70%	39.91%	-30.49%	64.13%	66.06%	93.56%	-9.80%	56.23%

Correlation

The correlation between IBKR and ASML is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.33
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2007	0.36

The correlation between IBKR and ASML shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (3 years) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap IBKR : $40.72B ASML : $718.77B
EPS IBKR : $3.76 ASML : €25.86
PE Ratio IBKR : 24.18 ASML : 62.30
PEG Ratio IBKR : 0.83 ASML : 4.10
PS Ratio IBKR : 4.66 ASML : 18.51
PB Ratio IBKR : 1.92 ASML : 29.83
Total Revenue (TTM) IBKR : $8.69B ASML : €33.69B
Gross Profit (TTM) IBKR : $7.75B ASML : €17.72B
EBITDA (TTM) IBKR : $7.07B ASML : €12.99B

Return for Risk

IBKR vs. ASML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBKR

IBKR Risk / Return Rank: 88
IBKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
IBKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
IBKR Omega Ratio Rank: 84
IBKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
IBKR Martin Ratio Rank: 89

ASML

ASML Risk / Return Rank: 95
ASML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
ASML Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
ASML Omega Ratio Rank: 92
ASML Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
ASML Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBKR vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IBKR	ASML	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.08	3.27	-1.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.67	3.70	-1.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.45	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.20	7.83	-3.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.65	21.08	-10.43

IBKR vs. ASML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBKR Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is lower than the ASML Sharpe Ratio of 3.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBKR and ASML, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IBKR vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBKR drawdown since its inception was -63.66%, smaller than the maximum ASML drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBKR and ASML.

Drawdown Indicators

	IBKR	ASML	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.66%	-90.00%	+26.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.70%	-17.85%	-0.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-38.66%	-45.38%	+6.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.66%	-56.84%	+18.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-55.09%	-56.84%	+1.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.89%	+1.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.85%	-28.12%	+3.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.35%	6.63%	+0.72%

Volatility

IBKR vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) is 11.31%, while ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) has a volatility of 17.27%. This indicates that IBKR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IBKR	ASML	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.31%	17.27%	-5.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.82%	34.58%	-6.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.67%	42.75%	-5.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.50%	42.44%	-7.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.37%	38.72%	-5.35%

Dividends

IBKR vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison

IBKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than ASML's 0.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASML ASML Holding N.V.	0.47%	0.97%	0.97%	0.86%	1.27%	0.50%	0.50%	1.40%	0.94%	0.64%	0.92%	0.73%
IBKR Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.	0.36%	0.47%	0.48%	0.48%	0.55%	0.50%	0.66%	0.86%	0.73%	0.68%	1.10%	0.92%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IBKR and ASML in my portfolio?

IBKR and ASML have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IBKR or ASML?

ASML has higher volatility (17.27%) compared to IBKR (11.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBKR dropped -63.66% vs ASML's -90.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.27 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.