IBIT vs. XBLC.L
IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) and XBLC.L (Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while XBLC.L is a European Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBIT returned -36.83% vs 2.84% for XBLC.L. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IBIT charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XBLC.L.
Performance
IBIT vs. XBLC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IBIT is traded in USD, while XBLC.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XBLC.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBIT achieves a -23.99% return, which is significantly lower than XBLC.L's -0.31% return.
IBIT
- 1D
- 4.72%
- 1M
- -15.80%
- YTD
- -23.99%
- 6M
- -22.44%
- 1Y
- -36.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XBLC.L
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- -0.31%
- 6M
- -0.17%
- 1Y
- 2.84%
- 3Y*
- 6.80%
- 5Y*
- -0.55%
- 10Y*
- —
IBIT vs. XBLC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -23.99% | -6.41% | 89.87% |
XBLC.L Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C | -0.31% | 16.78% | -0.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBIT and XBLC.L is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBIT vs. XBLC.L — Risk / Return Rank
IBIT
XBLC.L
IBIT vs. XBLC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) and Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XBLC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBIT | XBLC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.07 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | 0.43 | -1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.24 | 1.14 | -2.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBIT vs. XBLC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBIT drawdown since its inception was -52.11%, which is greater than XBLC.L's maximum drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIT and XBLC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBIT | XBLC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.11% | -34.64% | -17.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.11% | -6.55% | -45.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -8.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.06% | -5.88% | -41.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.58% | -11.49% | -5.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.79% | 2.48% | +27.31% |
Volatility
IBIT vs. XBLC.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a higher volatility of 12.94% compared to Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XBLC.L) at 2.11%. This indicates that IBIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XBLC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBIT | XBLC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.94% | 2.11% | +10.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.80% | 5.75% | +29.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.40% | 7.59% | +36.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.31% | 9.31% | +41.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.31% | 8.81% | +41.50% |
IBIT vs. XBLC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBIT has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XBLC.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBIT vs. XBLC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IBIT nor XBLC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IBIT and XBLC.L have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XBLC.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XBLC.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.
IBIT is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while XBLC.L is European Corporate Bonds. IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant, while XBLC.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IBIT and 0.12% for XBLC.L.
Find the right allocation for IBIT and XBLC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer