IBIL vs. SCHP
IBIL (iShares iBonds Oct 2035 Term TIPS ETF) and SCHP (Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds - IBIL tracks the ICE 2035 Maturity US Treasury TIPS Index while SCHP tracks the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBIL returned 2.51% vs 1.85% for SCHP. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IBIL charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHP.
Performance
IBIL vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBIL achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly lower than SCHP's 0.76% return.
IBIL
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -0.59%
- 6M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 0.60%
- 1Y
- 2.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.96%
SCHP
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -0.55%
- 6M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 1.85%
- 3Y*
- 3.88%
- 5Y*
- 0.43%
- 10Y*
- 2.43%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.74%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $384.77K | $347.69K | $275.27K | |
| $122.36M | $105.85M | $110.38M |
IBIL vs. SCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IBIL iShares iBonds Oct 2035 Term TIPS ETF | 0.60% | 4.77% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 0.76% | 3.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBIL and SCHP is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2025 | 0.87 |
The correlation between IBIL and SCHP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBIL vs. SCHP — Risk / Return Rank
IBIL
SCHP
IBIL vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2035 Term TIPS ETF (IBIL) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IBIL | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.10 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | 0.96 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.03 | 2.57 | -0.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IBIL vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBIL drawdown since its inception was -5.28%, smaller than the maximum SCHP drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIL and SCHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBIL | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.28% | -14.26% | +8.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.76% | -1.93% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -14.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.62% | -1.09% | -0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.44% | -3.90% | +2.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.24% | 0.72% | +0.52% |
Volatility
IBIL vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison
iShares iBonds Oct 2035 Term TIPS ETF (IBIL) has a higher volatility of 1.01% compared to Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) at 0.70%. This indicates that IBIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBIL | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.01% | 0.70% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.30% | 2.44% | +0.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.55% | 3.21% | +2.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.85% | 6.11% | +1.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.85% | 5.58% | +2.27% |
IBIL vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBIL has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHP's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBIL vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison
IBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.14%, more than SCHP's 5.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIL iShares iBonds Oct 2035 Term TIPS ETF | 5.14% | 2.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 5.03% | 4.06% | 2.99% | 3.02% | 7.19% | 4.39% | 1.11% | 2.02% | 2.26% | 1.90% | 1.38% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBIL and SCHP have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBIL has higher volatility (1.01%) compared to SCHP (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBIL dropped -5.28% vs SCHP's -14.26%.
On 1-year performance, IBIL leads with 2.51% vs 1.85% for SCHP. On fees, SCHP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBIL has performed better with a 2.51% return vs 1.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBIL.
IBIL has the higher dividend yield at 5.14%, compared with 5.03% for SCHP.
IBIL tracks ICE 2035 Maturity US Treasury TIPS Index, while SCHP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBIL and 0.03% for SCHP.
SCHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.58 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBIL and SCHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer