PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBIK vs. IBII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBIK vs. IBII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Oct 2034 Term TIPS ETF (IBIK) and iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term TIPS ETF (IBII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBIK achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than IBII's 1.63% return.


IBIK

1D
-0.02%
1M
-0.29%
YTD
1.43%
6M
1.01%
1Y
5.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBII

1D
0.02%
1M
-0.38%
YTD
1.63%
6M
1.21%
1Y
5.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBIK vs. IBII - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IBIK
iShares iBonds Oct 2034 Term TIPS ETF
1.43%8.78%1.43%
IBII
iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term TIPS ETF
1.63%8.65%2.04%

Correlation

The correlation between IBIK and IBII is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2024

0.96

The correlation between IBIK and IBII has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBIK vs. IBII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBIK
IBIK Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
IBIK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIK Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIK Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

IBII
IBII Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
IBII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBII Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBII Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IBII Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBII Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBIK vs. IBII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2034 Term TIPS ETF (IBIK) and iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term TIPS ETF (IBII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBIKIBIIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.28

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

2.68

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.74

9.32

-1.58

IBIK vs. IBII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBIK Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the IBII Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBIK and IBII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBIKIBIIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

1.56

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

1.12

-0.04

Drawdowns

IBIK vs. IBII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBIK drawdown since its inception was -5.59%, which is greater than IBII's maximum drawdown of -4.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIK and IBII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBIKIBIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.59%

-4.65%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.50%

-1.98%

-0.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

-0.65%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.24%

-1.12%

-0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.72%

0.58%

+0.14%

Volatility

IBIK vs. IBII - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBonds Oct 2034 Term TIPS ETF (IBIK) has a higher volatility of 1.19% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term TIPS ETF (IBII) at 0.89%. This indicates that IBIK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBIKIBIIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.19%

0.89%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.82%

2.29%

+0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.20%

3.42%

+0.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.33%

5.42%

-0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.33%

5.42%

-0.09%

IBIK vs. IBII - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IBIK and IBII have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBIK vs. IBII - Dividend Comparison

IBIK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, less than IBII's 4.05% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBII
iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term TIPS ETF
4.05%4.80%4.76%1.10%
IBIK
iShares iBonds Oct 2034 Term TIPS ETF
3.73%4.43%2.67%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, IBIK and IBII move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IBIK has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to IBII (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBIK dropped -5.59% vs IBII's -4.65%.

On 1-year performance, IBIK leads with 5.54% vs 5.28% for IBII. Both ETFs have the same 0.10% expense ratio. On volatility, IBII has been the lower-risk option at 0.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBIK has performed better with a 5.54% return vs 5.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIK and IBII have the same expense ratio: 0.10% per year.

IBII has the higher dividend yield at 4.05%, compared with 3.73% for IBIK.

IBIK tracks iBonds Oct 2034 Term TIPS Index, while IBII tracks ICE 2032 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index.

IBII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBIK and IBII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer