PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBIJ vs. VTP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBIJ vs. VTP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Oct 2033 Term TIPS ETF (IBIJ) and Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBIJ achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly higher than VTP's 0.93% return.


IBIJ

1D
-0.14%
1M
0.11%
6M
1.17%
YTD
1.19%
1Y
3.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.43%

VTP

1D
-0.16%
1M
-0.25%
6M
0.85%
YTD
0.93%
1Y
3.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBIJ vs. VTP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IBIJ and VTP is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025

0.95

The correlation between IBIJ and VTP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBIJ vs. VTP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBIJ
IBIJ Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
IBIJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIJ Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

VTP
VTP Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
VTP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTP Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
VTP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTP Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBIJ vs. VTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2033 Term TIPS ETF (IBIJ) and Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBIJVTPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.16

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

1.60

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.93

4.48

+0.45

IBIJ vs. VTP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBIJ Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is comparable to the VTP Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBIJ and VTP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBIJ vs. VTP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBIJ drawdown since its inception was -5.27%, which is greater than VTP's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIJ and VTP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBIJVTPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.27%

-1.92%

-3.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.32%

-1.92%

-0.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

-0.91%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.29%

-0.54%

-0.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.76%

0.68%

+0.08%

Volatility

IBIJ vs. VTP - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBonds Oct 2033 Term TIPS ETF (IBIJ) has a higher volatility of 1.14% compared to Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP) at 1.04%. This indicates that IBIJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBIJVTPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

1.04%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.92%

2.49%

+0.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.96%

3.35%

+0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.83%

3.33%

+2.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.83%

3.33%

+2.50%

IBIJ vs. VTP - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBIJ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VTP's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBIJ vs. VTP - Dividend Comparison

IBIJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.49%, more than VTP's 2.98% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBIJ
iShares iBonds Oct 2033 Term TIPS ETF
5.49%4.66%4.42%0.60%
VTP
Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF
2.98%1.56%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, IBIJ and VTP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IBIJ has higher volatility (1.14%) compared to VTP (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBIJ dropped -5.27% vs VTP's -1.92%.

On 1-year performance, IBIJ leads with 3.74% vs 3.05% for VTP. On fees, VTP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VTP has been the lower-risk option at 1.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBIJ has performed better with a 3.74% return vs 3.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBIJ.

IBIJ has the higher dividend yield at 5.49%, compared with 2.98% for VTP.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBIJ and 0.05% for VTP.

IBIJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBIJ and VTP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer