PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBIJ vs. CPII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBIJ vs. CPII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Oct 2033 Term TIPS ETF (IBIJ) and Ionic Inflation Protection ETF (CPII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBIJ achieves a 1.61% return, which is significantly lower than CPII's 2.86% return.


IBIJ

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.33%
YTD
1.61%
6M
1.33%
1Y
4.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CPII

1D
0.21%
1M
-0.99%
YTD
2.86%
6M
2.78%
1Y
3.44%
3Y*
4.45%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBIJ vs. CPII - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IBIJ
iShares iBonds Oct 2033 Term TIPS ETF
1.61%8.59%0.69%4.98%
CPII
Ionic Inflation Protection ETF
2.86%2.76%6.05%-0.75%

Correlation

The correlation between IBIJ and CPII is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2023

-0.34

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between IBIJ and CPII has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.34 to -0.02, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBIJ vs. CPII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBIJ
IBIJ Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
IBIJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIJ Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

CPII
CPII Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
CPII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPII Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPII Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
CPII Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPII Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBIJ vs. CPII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2033 Term TIPS ETF (IBIJ) and Ionic Inflation Protection ETF (CPII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBIJCPIIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.20

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

1.62

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.23

4.45

+1.79

IBIJ vs. CPII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBIJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is comparable to the CPII Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBIJ and CPII, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBIJ vs. CPII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBIJ drawdown since its inception was -5.27%, smaller than the maximum CPII drawdown of -6.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIJ and CPII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBIJCPIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.27%

-6.40%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.32%

-2.13%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-1.74%

+1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.29%

-1.61%

+0.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.72%

0.78%

-0.06%

Volatility

IBIJ vs. CPII - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBonds Oct 2033 Term TIPS ETF (IBIJ) has a higher volatility of 1.51% compared to Ionic Inflation Protection ETF (CPII) at 0.79%. This indicates that IBIJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPII based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBIJCPIIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.51%

0.79%

+0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.89%

2.84%

+0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.97%

3.35%

+0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.87%

5.89%

-0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.87%

5.89%

-0.02%

IBIJ vs. CPII - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBIJ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than CPII's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBIJ vs. CPII - Dividend Comparison

IBIJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, less than CPII's 4.10% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CPII
Ionic Inflation Protection ETF
4.10%4.20%5.47%5.86%2.21%
IBIJ
iShares iBonds Oct 2033 Term TIPS ETF
3.93%4.66%4.42%0.60%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBIJ and CPII have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBIJ has higher volatility (1.51%) compared to CPII (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBIJ dropped -5.27% vs CPII's -6.40%.

On 1-year performance, IBIJ leads with 4.51% vs 3.44% for CPII. On fees, IBIJ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, CPII has been the lower-risk option at 0.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBIJ has performed better with a 4.51% return vs 3.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIJ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for CPII.

CPII has the higher dividend yield at 4.10%, compared with 3.93% for IBIJ.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Ionic. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBIJ and 0.74% for CPII.

IBIJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBIJ and CPII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer