IBII vs. IRVH
IBII (iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term TIPS ETF) and IRVH (Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. IBII is passively managed, while IRVH is actively managed. Over the past year, IBII returned 5.28% vs -1.82% for IRVH. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IBII charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IRVH.
Performance
IBII vs. IRVH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBII achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly higher than IRVH's -3.32% return.
IBII
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- YTD
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 1.21%
- 1Y
- 5.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IRVH
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -1.24%
- YTD
- -3.32%
- 6M
- -3.31%
- 1Y
- -1.82%
- 3Y*
- -0.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBII vs. IRVH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBII iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term TIPS ETF | 1.63% | 8.65% | 1.21% | 4.85% |
IRVH Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | -3.32% | 7.71% | -5.49% | 6.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBII and IRVH is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2023 | 0.65 |
The correlation between IBII and IRVH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBII vs. IRVH — Risk / Return Rank
IBII
IRVH
IBII vs. IRVH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term TIPS ETF (IBII) and Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IRVH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBII | IRVH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.95 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | -0.37 | +3.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.32 | -0.77 | +10.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBII | IRVH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | -0.37 | +1.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | -0.22 | +1.34 |
Drawdowns
IBII vs. IRVH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBII drawdown since its inception was -4.65%, smaller than the maximum IRVH drawdown of -14.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBII and IRVH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBII | IRVH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.65% | -14.98% | +10.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.98% | -4.94% | +2.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -8.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.65% | -10.32% | +9.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.12% | -9.72% | +8.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.58% | 2.35% | -1.77% |
Volatility
IBII vs. IRVH - Volatility Comparison
iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term TIPS ETF (IBII) has a higher volatility of 0.89% compared to Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IRVH) at 0.71%. This indicates that IBII's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IRVH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBII | IRVH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.89% | 0.71% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.29% | 3.27% | -0.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.42% | 4.96% | -1.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.42% | 8.84% | -3.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.42% | 8.84% | -3.42% |
IBII vs. IRVH - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBII has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IRVH's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IBII vs. IRVH - Dividend Comparison
IBII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, less than IRVH's 5.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBII iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term TIPS ETF | 4.05% | 4.80% | 4.76% | 1.10% | 0.00% |
IRVH Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | 5.56% | 4.89% | 3.34% | 3.69% | 2.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBII and IRVH have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBII has higher volatility (0.89%) compared to IRVH (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBII dropped -4.65% vs IRVH's -14.98%.
On 1-year performance, IBII leads with 5.28% vs -1.82% for IRVH. On fees, IBII is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IRVH has been the lower-risk option at 0.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBII has performed better with a 5.28% return vs -1.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBII is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IRVH.
IRVH has the higher dividend yield at 5.56%, compared with 4.05% for IBII.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBII and 0.50% for IRVH.
IBII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBII and IRVH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer