PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBII vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBII vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term TIPS ETF (IBII) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBII achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -31.24% return.


IBII

1D
0.02%
1M
-0.38%
YTD
1.63%
6M
1.21%
1Y
5.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBIT

1D
-5.22%
1M
-26.09%
YTD
-31.24%
6M
-32.65%
1Y
-41.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBII vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IBII
iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term TIPS ETF
1.63%8.65%1.41%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-31.24%-6.41%99.21%

Correlation

The correlation between IBII and IBIT is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBII vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBII
IBII Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
IBII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBII Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBII Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IBII Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBII Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBII vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term TIPS ETF (IBII) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IBIIIBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

0.85

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

-0.79

+3.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.32

-1.43

+10.75

IBII vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBII Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBII and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IBIIIBITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56

-0.94

+2.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

0.22

+0.90

Drawdowns

IBII vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBII drawdown since its inception was -4.65%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -52.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBII and IBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBIIIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.65%

-52.11%

+47.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.98%

-52.11%

+50.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-52.11%

+51.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.12%

-16.13%

+15.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.58%

28.80%

-28.22%

Volatility

IBII vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term TIPS ETF (IBII) is 0.89%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 9.97%. This indicates that IBII experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBIIIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.89%

9.97%

-9.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.29%

34.18%

-31.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.42%

44.04%

-40.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.42%

50.26%

-44.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.42%

50.26%

-44.84%

IBII vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBII has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBII vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

IBII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBII
iShares iBonds Oct 2032 Term TIPS ETF
4.05%4.80%4.76%1.10%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBII and IBIT have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBIT has higher volatility (9.97%) compared to IBII (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBII dropped -4.65% vs IBIT's -52.11%.

On 1-year performance, IBII leads with 5.28% vs -41.01% for IBIT. On fees, IBII is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBII has been the lower-risk option at 0.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBII has performed better with a 5.28% return vs -41.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBII is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.

IBII has the higher dividend yield at 4.05%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

IBII is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. IBII tracks ICE 2032 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBII and 0.25% for IBIT.

IBII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBII and IBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer