IBIH vs. PBTP
IBIH (iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF) and PBTP (Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds - IBIH tracks the ICE 2031 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index while PBTP tracks the ICE BofA U.S. Treasuries Inflation-Linked (0-5 Y). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBIH returned 5.49% vs 4.68% for PBTP. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IBIH charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for PBTP.
Performance
IBIH vs. PBTP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBIH achieves a 1.68% return, which is significantly lower than PBTP's 2.15% return.
IBIH
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -0.48%
- YTD
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- 5.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBTP
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 2.15%
- 6M
- 2.14%
- 1Y
- 4.68%
- 3Y*
- 5.23%
- 5Y*
- 3.32%
- 10Y*
- —
IBIH vs. PBTP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIH iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF | 1.68% | 8.47% | 1.73% | 4.60% |
PBTP Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF | 2.15% | 5.98% | 4.72% | 2.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBIH and PBTP is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2023 | 0.84 |
The correlation between IBIH and PBTP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBIH vs. PBTP — Risk / Return Rank
IBIH
PBTP
IBIH vs. PBTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF (IBIH) and Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBIH | PBTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.66 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 7.08 | -3.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.91 | 24.51 | -13.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBIH | PBTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 3.05 | -1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.25 | 1.30 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
IBIH vs. PBTP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBIH drawdown since its inception was -3.94%, smaller than the maximum PBTP drawdown of -5.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBIH and PBTP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBIH | PBTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.94% | -5.44% | +1.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.70% | -0.66% | -1.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -5.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -0.02% | -0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.96% | -0.75% | -0.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.50% | 0.19% | +0.31% |
Volatility
IBIH vs. PBTP - Volatility Comparison
iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF (IBIH) has a higher volatility of 0.85% compared to Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP) at 0.40%. This indicates that IBIH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBTP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBIH | PBTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.85% | 0.40% | +0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.09% | 1.03% | +1.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.16% | 1.54% | +1.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.93% | 2.85% | +2.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.93% | 2.64% | +2.29% |
IBIH vs. PBTP - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBIH has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than PBTP's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBIH vs. PBTP - Dividend Comparison
IBIH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, more than PBTP's 3.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIH iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term TIPS ETF | 3.90% | 4.68% | 4.34% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PBTP Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF | 3.10% | 3.82% | 2.59% | 2.36% | 5.33% | 3.12% | 1.25% | 2.12% | 2.33% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IBIH and PBTP have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBIH has higher volatility (0.85%) compared to PBTP (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBIH dropped -3.94% vs PBTP's -5.44%.
On 1-year performance, IBIH leads with 5.49% vs 4.68% for PBTP. On fees, PBTP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, PBTP has been the lower-risk option at 0.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBIH has performed better with a 5.49% return vs 4.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PBTP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBIH.
IBIH has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 3.10% for PBTP.
IBIH tracks ICE 2031 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index, while PBTP tracks ICE BofA U.S. Treasuries Inflation-Linked (0-5 Y). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IBIH and 0.07% for PBTP.
PBTP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBIH and PBTP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer